PDA

View Full Version : how much is too much??


violentblossom
30-01-09, 22:52
Recently, pictures of Miley Cyrus were taken in a pretty revealing halter top thingy and you can very clearly see the majority of the side of her breast.

While i understand that she made the choice to wear this shirt, i can't help but feel kinda icky that these pictures were even released because, after all, the girl is only 16. So, here's my question: where do we draw the line?? I didn't see the pictures of her back in Vanity Fair as being so wrong, but wow, these new pictures are pretty.. well, i guess you should see for yourself.

Shouldn't pictures this "sexy" of a young girl, even if they aren't full-on nude, be unallowed??

http://thesuperficial.com/2009/01/miley_cyrus_side_boob.php#comment

TRhalloween
30-01-09, 22:54
I don't think that top was supposed to be revealing. I mean, it's not slutty or anything.

jamieoliver22
30-01-09, 22:54
*flop*

toxicraider
30-01-09, 22:55
That, is too much.
I don't think young stars should be sexualised at all, it's just wrong.

violentblossom
30-01-09, 22:56
I don't think that top was supposed to be revealing. I mean, it's not slutty or anything.

i don't think she wore it to look that way, and i don't blame her, but really, did the pics need to be put up?

come on, stalker-razzis! that's gross. there should be discretion when pics are put up.

toxicraider
30-01-09, 22:57
They shouldn't really let them stalk young people like that anyway. Even for adult stars it completely invades the privacy they're entitled to.

Feather Duster
30-01-09, 22:58
I don't think that top was supposed to be revealing. I mean, it's not slutty or anything.

:eek: lol Like no offense, but it looks like the shirt is WAY too big!

Love2Raid
30-01-09, 23:02
I see no reason why they shouldn't place those pictures on the web. She is old enough to decide what she should wear.

iamlaracroft
30-01-09, 23:02
Discretion or good intention is nonexistent in the paparazzi arena.
Anything you display (regardless of intention) can and will be used against you.
Besides, Smiley's side boob is nothing compared to Britney's full-on hoo-hoo shots.

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:03
Discretion or good intention is nonexistent in the paparazzi arena.
Anything you display (regardless of intention) can and will be used against you.
Side boob is nothing compared to Britney's full-on hoo-hoo shots.

True, but were talking about a girl who's recently turned 16. Britney was an adult before her hoo ha was everywhere.

iamlaracroft
30-01-09, 23:04
Who cares? Girls her age and younger have much more revealing pics on their myspaces and facebooks.

digitizedboy
30-01-09, 23:07
Discretion or good intention is nonexistent in the paparazzi arena.
Anything you display (regardless of intention) can and will be used against you.
Besides, Smiley's side boob is nothing compared to Britney's full-on hoo-hoo shots.

Once you're a celebrity that's the price you pay. :| You're quite right. Couldn't care less though really. :)

jamieoliver22
30-01-09, 23:08
Who cares? Girls her age and younger have much more revealing pics on their myspaces and facebooks.

Yeah, exactly - There are many worst pictures around of people. I don't think she intended for it to be revealing anyway, just the media have to make a big deal out of things all the time. She has boobs, get over it - It is the female anatomy.

Not about this exactly, but it does **** me off when the media takes things and blows them out of proportion, and makes something out of nothing. Celebrities are still normal people, they do normal things. You wouldn't think that Beyonce takes a ****, but she does - just like everyone else. I hate it when the media makes things about peoples weight, that really bugs me. Anyway, sorry </rant>

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:09
you don't feel weird looking at that picture?

the difference between Miley and the rest of those girls is that:

1! those girls put those up on their own, and are not caught off guard

2! Miley Cyrus is famous.. opposed to those 15 year olds who aren't reaching near as much exposure.

Sexualizing a teen girl is creepy.

Love2Raid
30-01-09, 23:11
you don't feel weird looking at that picture?

the difference between Miley and the rest of those girls is that:

1! those girls put those up on their own, and are not caught off guard

2! Miley Cyrus is famous.. opposed to those 15 year olds who aren't reaching near as much exposure.

Sexualizing a teen girl is creepy.

Errrm, what do you expect when you wear something like THAT? It was her own choice.

But I agree, she is too young to be displayed like that.

jamieoliver22
30-01-09, 23:12
Sexualizing a teen girl is creepy.

I can see where you are coming from, the media do things like that, and it isn't exactly new. I do think it is wrong to take something out of context and sexualize it like they do. She is of legal age to have sex anyway...

Neteru
30-01-09, 23:13
I think the more important question is 'Why are you even bothering reading celebrity gossip websites and magazines?' They only exist because of superficiality. It's even in the url. If you want to see change in how people, particularly women, are portrayed and made to feel about themselves, be pro-active and refuse to engage with this kind of trash. Completely.

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:13
I can see where you are coming from, the media do things like that, and it isn't exactly new. She is of legal age to have sex anyway...

not in the U.S. :-\

18 in most states.

Lavinder
30-01-09, 23:13
I can see where you are coming from, the media do things like that, and it isn't exactly new. She is of legal age to have sex anyway...

She's not legal to be photographed nude until she is 18 ;).

-sigh- We live in such a censored world.

jamieoliver22
30-01-09, 23:17
She's not legal to be photographed nude until she is 18 ;).

-sigh- We live in such a censored world.

It's not quite nude though, is it?

And yeah, we do - we are born naked, we spent the majority of our native lives naked. The only reason we wore clothes was to stay warm, not to cover the ever so sacred 'private parts'. If everyone had to walk around naked nowadays, the world would be completely different.

iamlaracroft
30-01-09, 23:18
Might be just me, but I think 10-13 year old side boob would warrant more concern/thread than a 16 year old's.

Too, there's something about Smiley that doesn't exactly scream "teenager" and it's not an overwhelming sense of maturity :whi:

Lavinder
30-01-09, 23:22
It's not quite nude though, is it?

And yeah, we do - we are born naked, we spent the majority of our native lives naked. The only reason we wore clothes was to stay warm, not to cover the ever so sacred 'private parts'. If everyone had to walk around naked nowadays, the world would be completely different.

Well you're not allowed to photograph any part of her body deemed unnacceptable ;). Quite ironic that Emma Watson turned 18 and managed to flash her see through panties - if for example what's her name was to do this is would not be released.

What would the fun be in that? You have to have a certain degree of privacy - living in a nudest work would be ludicrous.

Lew
30-01-09, 23:22
I'm 16 and lots of people have seen my willy :) haha no but seriously its overlooked. Shes a teenager so shes bound to want to take her clothes off.

Lavinder
30-01-09, 23:24
I'm 16 and lots of people have seen my willy :) haha no but seriously its overlooked. Shes a teenager so shes bound to want to take her clothes off.

-cough, splutter, giggle- Sorry - I have to agree with you, most teenagers find it quite liberating.

Lew
30-01-09, 23:29
-cough, splutter, giggle- Sorry - I have to agree with you, most teenagers find it quite liberating.

do you have to be a ***** about everything/everyone?

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:29
do you have to be a ***** about everything/everyone?

:eek: :smk:

Lavinder
30-01-09, 23:33
do you have to be a ***** about everything/everyone?

I'm not?! Have you got the wrong end of the stick? :confused: I'm agreeing with you, just laughing at something else, but obviously you don't get the joke :p.

Lew
30-01-09, 23:34
Erm how about you always do it?

Lavinder
30-01-09, 23:36
-both hands up- Here's me thinking I could be nice? Obviously things are still tense - even though you always preach to people to stop arguing :ton:.

Anyway, back to side boob. :mis:

marla_biggs
30-01-09, 23:36
it's not that bad imo......just a really bad angle!!

Indiana Croft
30-01-09, 23:39
What's the big deal? If that's how she wants to dress, thats how she's gonna dress. We can't do anything about it anyway.

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:40
What's the big deal? If that's how she wants to dress, thats how she's gonna dress. We can't do anything about it anyway.

that's not the point, i don't care how she dresses, but a little more boob, and that pic would be borderline child porn.

iamlaracroft
30-01-09, 23:46
...except she's not a child.

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:49
...except she's not a child.

according to who's law? she is in the States, and that's where she's from.

TRhalloween
30-01-09, 23:53
that's not the point, i don't care how she dresses, but a little more boob, and that pic would be borderline child porn.

I blame the person who likes it, in that case.

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:54
I blame the person who likes it, in that case.

LOL, fair enough.

iamlaracroft
30-01-09, 23:55
Oh come on. Child porn with a 16 year old? It's just so dramatic and alarmist. Why does this bother you so much?

Is this child porn? He's 16.
http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/liverpoolecho/may2008/5/1/00A452CE-FE20-7BA4-E9E004C72812C933.jpg

What about this? Is this child pornography?
http://blogs.bbc.co.uk/worldhaveyoursay/obese_child203.jpg
Gasp!

Oh no! This one's really young.
http://blogs.chron.com/schoolzone/russian%20wrestler

irjudd
30-01-09, 23:56
If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and walks like a duck... :whi:

violentblossom
30-01-09, 23:57
Oh come on. Child porn with a 16 year old? It's just so dramatic and alarmist. Why does this bother you so much?

Is this child porn? He's 16.
http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2008/05/obesemanREX_175x125.jpg

What about this? Is this child pornography?
http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/liverpoolecho/may2008/5/1/00A452CE-FE20-7BA4-E9E004C72812C933.jpg

Gasp!

Except that that individual is a MALE.. man boob is not considered genatalia. Show part of those boys' private parts and then we'll have apples compared to apples.

Lew
30-01-09, 23:58
forum rules clearly state that you cannot post topless pics of any kind....

Neteru
31-01-09, 00:03
forum rules clearly state that you cannot post topless pics of any kind....Not quite. Nevertheless she is using the pics to illustrate a reasonable point. Though this does not set any kind of precedent.

Tombcool
31-01-09, 00:04
I do think that is too much. D:

iamlaracroft
31-01-09, 00:05
Except that that individual is a MALE.. man boob is not considered genatalia. Show part of those boys' private parts and then we'll have apples compared to apples.

LOL oh man. No medical definition of genitalia includes breasts, be it that of a man or woman.

It's very telling that you view women's breasts to be "genitalia" and "private" parts and not what they really are, fatty tissue-- same as what men have.
Double standard anyone? :whi:

violentblossom
31-01-09, 00:07
LOL oh man. No medical definition of genitalia includes breasts, be it that of a man or woman.

It's very telling that you consider women's breasts to be genitalia and not what they really are, fatty tissue with nipples-- same as what men have.
Double standard anyone? :whi:

okay, you've got me there, but you know what i mean.

no one considers man boob offensive.

there's a reason female breasts are censored.

i'm just offended that a 16 year old is being sexualized.

EDIT: BTW, when 16 year old Jamie Lynn was photographed breast feeding, it was considered child porn.

Neteru
31-01-09, 00:10
i'm just offended that a 16 year old is being sexualized.Then stop buying into superficial media.

Lavinder
31-01-09, 00:12
It's very telling that you view women's breasts to be "genitalia" and "private" parts and not what they really are, fatty tissue-- same as what men have.
Double standard anyone? :whi:

I'm not trying to start an argument or anything I just want to know your view. What would your view be on young woman 12-15 being photographed and being shown around on the internet ?

I believe that (forgot her name again) is being sexualised through the media, but she chooses to do this to herself, so it's not such a scandal as if she had been photographed by accident revealing her body without meaning to.

iamlaracroft
31-01-09, 00:15
A lot of broad generalities there.

Maybe I find man boob offensive? Maybe many more people than you think are offended by man boob and find the double standard that men are allowed to show their breasts but women cannot ludicrous.

Those who said Jamie Lynn Spear's breastfeeding her baby was "child porn" need to get a life and get out of the house.

I'm not trying to start an argument or anything I just want to know your view. What would your view be on young woman 12-15 being photographed and being shown around on the internet ?

I believe that (forgot her name again) is being sexualised through the media, but she chooses to do this to herself, so it's not such a scandal as if she had been photographed by accident revealing her body without meaning to.

I have no issue with 12-15 year old children/teens being photographed and being shown on the internet as it's quite common actually on myspace and facebook, etc. ;)
But if you're asking what my view is on a 12-15 year old being photographed nude in some form or fashion, read through the thread. I already answered this two pages ago.

violentblossom
31-01-09, 00:20
Those who said Jamie Lynn Spear's breastfeeding her baby was "child porn" need to get a life and get out of the house.

Are you by any chance European? Maybe that is where the difference in our opinions lies..

Whatever the case, its not just random people saying 16 year old breasts can't be exposed, that's the law here.

iamlaracroft
31-01-09, 00:24
Are you by any chance European? Maybe that is where the difference in our opinions lies..

Whatever the case, its not just random people saying female 16 year old breasts can't be exposed, that's the law here.

Edited for accuracy and double standard enforcement ;)

And nope, not European. I was born and raised in San Antonio :ton:
Do you think it's inappropriate for a mother to breastfeed in public?

IceColdLaraCroft
31-01-09, 00:27
It isn't acceptable to "sexualise" someone her age because her audience isn't older than her...her audience is YOUNGER than her...Girls shouldn't be "sexy" until college. Then they can **** out all they want. There's no class anymore amongst young women anymore. I blame Paris Hilton, Beyonce, Britney Spears, Cristina Aguileria, etc.

erosan
31-01-09, 00:27
Honestly, i'm surprise so many people give a **** about this... Some people wear less than than that, and it's not the end of the world.

violentblossom
31-01-09, 00:29
Edited for accuracy and double standard enforcement ;)

And nope, not European. I was born and raised in San Antonio :ton:
Do you think it's inappropriate for a mother to breastfeed in public?

i personally don't care for the visual of someone breastfeeding, but i'm not offended morally or anything by it.

that's not the point here.

breastfeeding is a biological thing.. and in no way thought to fit under the category of mainstream sexuality.

Miley is not breastfeeding.. she is being sexualized outright, and i don't think anyone's denying that.

Pictures of Jamie Lynn breast feeding is offensive BECAUSE OF HER AGE, not the act itself. I don't care what the reason, if its illegal for her breasts to be seen plastered places, then it shouldn't be allowed.

Tonyrobinson
31-01-09, 00:35
Well the only thing is that 16 is legal is some countries

iamlaracroft
31-01-09, 00:44
i personally don't care for the visual of someone breastfeeding, but i'm not offended morally or anything by it.

that's not the point here.

breastfeeding is a biological thing.. and in no way thought to fit under the category of mainstream sexuality.

Miley is not breastfeeding.. she is being sexualized outright, and i don't think anyone's denying that.

Pictures of Jamie Lynn breast feeding is offensive BECAUSE OF HER AGE, not the act itself. I don't care what the reason, if its illegal for her breasts to be seen plastered places, then it shouldn't be allowed.


Correction: It is your opinion that pictures of a young mother breastfeeding are offensive. Please don't post sweeping generalities as if they are fact. And let me just point out that breasts are plastered everywhere in public and the media in the form of cleavage. So, actually, there was nothing "illegal" (:vlol:) about the photos of JLS breastfeeding as her nipples we not visible.

One observation before I leave (because this has been exhausting!):
I don't have children (wayyyy too young, I'm nearly 23), will never have children, have absolutely no desire or wish or hope to have children. In fact, I quite despise them, but yet I argue for the right of a mother to breastfeed her child in public because it is one of the most natural and instinctual acts a mammal can do.
...And yet you are a mother of a young baby/infant and you don't care for the "visual" and seem to be quite offended by JLS's breastfeeding photos.

Just a curious observation, that's all.
That's all from me on this, as I think I've made it abundantly clear how little I care about Smiley's sideboob.
G'night :)

violentblossom
31-01-09, 00:49
Correction: It is your opinion that pictures of a young mother breastfeeding are offensive. Please don't post sweeping generalities as if they are fact. And let me just point out that breasts are plastered everywhere in public and the media in the form of cleavage. So, actually, there was nothing "illegal" (:vlol:) about the photos of JLS breastfeeding as her nipples we not visible.

One observation before I leave (because this has been exhausting!):
I don't have children (wayyyy too young, I'm nearly 23), will never have children, have absolutely no desire or wish or hope to have children. In fact, I quite despise them, but yet I argue for the right of a mother to breastfeed her child in public because it is one of the most natural and instinctual acts a mammal can do.
...And yet you are a mother of a young baby/infant and you don't care for the "visual" and seem to be quite offended by JLS's breastfeeding photos.

Just a curious observation, that's all.
That's all from me on this, as I think I've made it abundantly clear how little I care about Smiley's sideboob.
G'night :)

I've beat my point into the ground like a cowboy kicks a dead horse, but i will say it one last time.

I'm against the SEXUALIZATION part of this, but will take Neteru's advice and stay off The Superficial in the future.

I didn't say i was offended by breast feeding eiether, btw, i just don't care personally to see other women do it in public. They can do it all they please, i won't say anything.

Smog
31-01-09, 01:40
Honestly, i'm surprise so many people give a **** about this... Some people wear less than than that, and it's not the end of the world.

My sentiments exactly. Well, apart from the "surprised" bit.

Indiana Croft
31-01-09, 02:07
The fact of the Matter is that Miley Cyrus really isn't that much of a child. Give like what, two or three years and THEN its okay? It's just side boob! You're telling me that you want to basically make this girl sign a contract to take away her freedom of expression through her clothes just because SOME people find it offensive. And why is it offensive? Is it because she stars on a kid show? Not every disney teen is clad in chastity rings. Remember Vanessa Hudgens? That ***** showed EVERYTHING on PURPOSE! And she wasn't even fired! Point blank, Miley Cyrus isn't a bad role model just cause she accidently let some side boob slip, so leave the poor girl alone. As for the sexualization part, no one is going around and saying "Ooooo, side boob, can anyone say JAIL BAIT?" It's not like she set out that evening thinking "I think I'll show some side boob to turn on my fans." So relax. No one took this as something sexual beyond the fact that it is indeed an ACCIDENTAL sneak peak at her village feeders.

violentblossom
31-01-09, 16:50
The fact of the Matter is that Miley Cyrus really isn't that much of a child. Give like what, two or three years and THEN its okay? It's just side boob! You're telling me that you want to basically make this girl sign a contract to take away her freedom of expression through her clothes just because SOME people find it offensive. And why is it offensive? Is it because she stars on a kid show? Not every disney teen is clad in chastity rings. Remember Vanessa Hudgens? That ***** showed EVERYTHING on PURPOSE! And she wasn't even fired! Point blank, Miley Cyrus isn't a bad role model just cause she accidently let some side boob slip, so leave the poor girl alone. As for the sexualization part, no one is going around and saying "Ooooo, side boob, can anyone say JAIL BAIT?" It's not like she set out that evening thinking "I think I'll show some side boob to turn on my fans." So relax. No one took this as something sexual beyond the fact that it is indeed an ACCIDENTAL sneak peak at her village feeders.


I find it amusing that you tell me to relax when you're someone who seems to be taking my views personally (i.e your use of profanity).

I'm not saying Miley Cyrus has to run around in a chastity belt, you're not reading very closely.

Miley Cyrus wore a showy top, but you can't tell me that the girl set out to show that much of her breast. The shot was taken at a bad angle, and so its highly probable that she had no idea so much of her chest was visible, so really, it isn't the same as her staring into the camera provocatively and using the "come hither" motions with her finger. My issue is not with her or her choice of clothing, but the fact that someone said "Oh, she's a Disney kid, let's release these to throw a wrench in her career. Let's make this girl look even worse." Whether she's a bad influence or not, it sure seems like she's not the only one with a hand in her public persona, and that to me isn't cool or fair.. and she is by our laws, a child, and to me, that needs to be grounds enough for people to lay off.

If there was thought to be nothing remotely sexual about the pics, why on earth were they posted?? Exactly.

This is my opinion, if you aren't offended by the pictures, then that's fine, but at least read everything i've said before you respond to my posts.

Hermina94
31-01-09, 17:13
that's just horrible....the paparazzi should be ashamed...but otherwise,miley was also the one to blame!Why the hell didn't she wear a bra?

Indiana Croft
31-01-09, 19:44
I find it amusing that you tell me to relax when you're someone who seems to be taking my views personally (i.e your use of profanity).

I'm not saying Miley Cyrus has to run around in a chastity belt, you're not reading very closely.

Miley Cyrus wore a showy top, but you can't tell me that the girl set out to show that much of her breast. The shot was taken at a bad angle, and so its highly probable that she had no idea so much of her chest was visible, so really, it isn't the same as her staring into the camera provocatively and using the "come hither" motions with her finger. My issue is not with her or her choice of clothing, but the fact that someone said "Oh, she's a Disney kid, let's release these to throw a wrench in her career. Let's make this girl look even worse." Whether she's a bad influence or not, it sure seems like she's not the only one with a hand in her public persona, and that to me isn't cool or fair.. and she is by our laws, a child, and to me, that needs to be grounds enough for people to lay off.

If there was thought to be nothing remotely sexual about the pics, why on earth were they posted?? Exactly.

This is my opinion, if you aren't offended by the pictures, then that's fine, but at least read everything i've said before you respond to my posts.

I wasn't directing it at you, shirley come lately, i was directing at the people around the world who react the way i describe. I didn't even read you're comments.

violentblossom
31-01-09, 19:46
I wasn't directing it at you, shirley come lately, i was directing at the people around the world who react the way i describe. I didn't even read you're comments.

"You're telling me that you want to basically make this girl sign a contract to take away her freedom of expression through her clothes just because SOME people find it offensive. And why is it offensive?"

Actually, you were directing them at me (i guess you haven't reread your post), but its okay, i'm past it.

:tmb:

xMiSsCrOfTx
31-01-09, 20:02
What Miley chooses to wear is her business. If she thinks it makes her 'cool' and 'sexy' to wear shirts that show half of her boobs at her age, more power to her. Personally, I think she's annoying as hell and I don't even care what she does anymore. :vlol: It's getting kind of old hearing about her slutty pic of the week.

And personally, I think it's pretty sad how the media feels the need to amp up the sex appeal of girls younger and younger. Makes you wonder how far things will eventually go.

Indiana Croft
31-01-09, 23:54
"You're telling me that you want to basically make this girl sign a contract to take away her freedom of expression through her clothes just because SOME people find it offensive. And why is it offensive?"

Actually, you were directing them at me (i guess you haven't reread your post), but its okay, i'm past it.

:tmb:

I said SOME people. It doesn't say YOU. I know what I wrote, but thanks anyway. Nothing I've said says "Violentblossom". So, in that regard, we're done here

Crisl
01-02-09, 00:38
Well, as I look at the pictures it seems to me that she's just trying that top in some shop, she's not actually wearing it...and it's very probable that she didn't even know how much of her body that top reveals. Paparazzis just took the picture at the right time, that's all :) THEY wanted to make the scandal, so the question should be addressed to them, I guess. They wanted to show the 16 years old girl revealed like that...

spikejones
01-02-09, 03:44
huh.. I just noticed this. looks to me like the "shirt" or whatever that is supposed to be is just too big for her - or she doesn't fill it out well. Which ever way you want to look for her. I mean, fabric shouldn't droop like that if the clothes fit right.

Benguitar
01-02-09, 03:50
Just leave the girl alone, she is in a good family and I'm 100% sure Mr. and Mrs. Cyrus are taking care of it and know about it.

silver_wolf
01-02-09, 03:57
Disney is teh devil. That's all I've got to say on this.

Nefertiti_89
01-02-09, 04:27
Who gives a rats ass! There are plenty of 16 year olds that get around looking just like that and far far worse! If she wasnt famous nobody would even care.

People should just leave her alone so she can be a normal 16 year old like her parents want her to be.

spikejones
01-02-09, 04:30
well its hard to be a normal girl when you are famous. its just a hazard of the job. like having to watch for falling I-Beams when working at a construction site.

huh.. I just noticed this. looks to me like the "shirt" or whatever that is supposed to be is just too big for her - or she doesn't fill it out well. Which ever way you want to look for her. I mean, fabric shouldn't droop like that if the clothes fit right.
:vlol: I just realize I made a major typo there. :vlol:

that bold part should have said "at it";)

Minty Mouth
01-02-09, 08:58
The entire argument is pointless. I really dont give a cr@p about the pictures being "unsuitable" so im not gonna stay in this thread. When she tried on that dress, it was her choice. Shes a celebrity, she is used to it.

Its part and parcel of being famous. Your privacy doesnt exist. Dont like it, then lie low.

If you dont like it as a regular civilian, stop supporting it. But know that without it, the world would probably fall apart.

For now I'll just take these pictures and leave...

drakl0r
01-02-09, 09:03
How much is too much depends on how much do you think too much is :D

Lavinder
01-02-09, 12:54
I think these are two separate tops - one is more fitting, and the other is not.

http://thesuperficial.com//bfm_gallery/2009/01/0130%20Miley%20Cyrus%20Malfunction/gallery_main/gallery_main-0130_miley_cyrus_dressroom_15.jpg

http://thesuperficial.com//bfm_gallery/2009/01/0130%20Miley%20Cyrus%20Malfunction/gallery_main/gallery_main-0130_miley_cyrus_dressroom_00.jpg

touchthesky
01-02-09, 21:44
One word:Bra.

allie9x
01-02-09, 23:50
.. she probably jsut ran out of tape or something.. i dont think she intended it to be like that