PDA

View Full Version : Teeth banned?


FreakRaider
29-12-11, 12:46
I saw in a TRLE theard, that teeth is got permanendly banned from TRF.
Ehm, why? I thought Teeth was a great level designer, or am I wrong?

Matie
29-12-11, 12:48
He got banned because when the TRAR forum got opened he sent out over 700 PMs advertising it.

NRO.
29-12-11, 12:52
He got banned because when the TRAR forum got opened he sent out over 700 PMs advertising it.

That's a BS reason for a perma ban. =/

tomekkobialka
29-12-11, 12:53
It's the Revenge of the Misleading Thread Title! :eek:

I saw in a TRLE theard, that teeth is got permanendly banned from TRF.
Ehm, why? I thought Teeth was a great level designer, or am I wrong?

I don't think Teeth would've been banned if he was a bad level designer...but it's all down to T&C 5.x ;)

Zelda master
29-12-11, 13:07
700 PM's!? That's bloody insane :vlol:

TRL2009
29-12-11, 13:26
Misleading Title xD i was thinkin this "WTF! were not allowed to have teeth?!" O.O

FreakRaider
29-12-11, 13:44
Misleading Title xD i was thinkin this "WTF! were not allowed to have teeth?!" O.O

xD :vlol:

Spong
29-12-11, 13:49
Teeth? Who?
No1curr.

Sounds like he deserved it though :tmb:

Dents
29-12-11, 14:00
I spoke with him about this at the time, he actually sent around 10 PMs, to his close friends and people working on his project. There's no way he could send 700. How would that even be possible?!

Spong
29-12-11, 14:03
I spoke with him about this at the time, he actually sent around 10 PMs, to his close friends and people working on his project. There's no way he could send 700. How would that even be possible?!

No idea.

Mod edit: part of comment removed - don't start that again.

Gabi
29-12-11, 14:19
I saw in a TRLE theard, that teeth is got permanendly banned from TRF.
Ehm, why? I thought Teeth was a great level designer, or am I wrong?
Being a great level designer does not excuse one from obeying the rules, especially if they have already have been made aware of them.

Besides, this was almost three years ago, so I don't see the point of any further discussion of the matter.

@Spong: please, let's not go there.