PDA

View Full Version : Jennifer Aniston Still Angry With Angelina Jolie


Croftgirl
09-01-07, 16:30
Jennifer Aniston has snubbed Angelina Jolie’s invitation to meet up and make peace.The former ‘Friends’ actress was reportedly fuming after Angelina spoke publicly about how she grew close to Jennifer’s ex-husband Brad Pitt while they were filming ‘Mr. and Mrs. Smith’ together in 2005.According to friends, Angelina’s suggestion that the two women meet up and sort out their differences was not well received by Jennifer.
A pal of Jennifer’s told Britain’s Grazia magazine: “Jennifer is beyond furious. She said Angelina is pretty much the last person on the planet she would want to meet.“She says nothing could be gained from meeting up - she certainly doesn’t want to compare notes about Brad.“Jen says it seemed as if Angelina was publicly baiting her and she doesn’t appreciate it.”
It has also been suggested that Angelina - who has a seven-month-old biological daughter, Shiloh, with Brad, and two adopted children, Maddox and Zahara - made the comments to deliberately upset Jennifer, 37 and damage any friendly relationship between her and Brad, 43. A source said: “Angelina must have known it would anger Jen and poison waters between her and Brad, making it impossible for them to have any kind of amicable relationship.”

Lara's Boy
09-01-07, 16:48
you know, I don't usually get caught up in this Hollywood crap, but I think Aniston is ridiculous.

Sure, no one can deny that what happened was not exactly great for Jen, and sure she should be hurting...but she's just downright hateful it seems. I seriously doubt Angelina is purposely trying to hurt her...even from a cold cynical view - She's already taken her man, what else can she do? What else would she do? Angelina is happy and has a family, Jen is not and doesn't have a family. Maybe she should get over like everyone else in Hollywood does, and find another husband to have a life with, lmao.

People just really make me angry...I suppose that's why I don't pay attention (usually :p) to the silly drama of Hollywood, lol.

Elysia
09-01-07, 17:25
Me neither... although, if I was in Jen's shoes, I'd probably tell Angie to go to hell, too. (Although I'd probably just blow up her car instead... :p) I wouldn't want to be in the same room as the woman who stole my husband, let alone talk to her and have to be friendly...

dark_angel_7
09-01-07, 17:41
you know, I don't usually get caught up in this Hollywood crap, but I think Aniston is ridiculous.

Sure, no one can deny that what happened was not exactly great for Jen, and sure she should be hurting...but she's just downright hateful it seems. I seriously doubt Angelina is purposely trying to hurt her...even from a cold cynical view - She's already taken her man, what else can she do? What else would she do? Angelina is happy and has a family, Jen is not and doesn't have a family. Maybe she should get over like everyone else in Hollywood does, and find another husband to have a life with, lmao.

People just really make me angry...I suppose that's why I don't pay attention (usually :p) to the silly drama of Hollywood, lol.

Well said, I totally agree :tmb: . Jenifer needs to get these words into her head - GET OVER IT!!! I hate her. Angelina + Brad + Kids = happy family so stop trying to ruin evrything for them. Angelina is just trying to be kind for god sakes so what if she took your man. You weren't a great couple anyway IMO.

domina
09-01-07, 17:46
If the interview in question was in Vogue, I don't see how Angie could have been "baiting" Aniston:

Angie: "But... so... you asked if I have ever met Jennifer and I said no. I did, but it was not a proper meeting. We've, like, passed each other and said hi briefly, shook hands. But not a real sit-down-and-talk kind of meeting."
Vogue: Do you imagine that happening at some point?
Angie: "That would be her decision, and I would welcome it."

I can't say for certain as I don't know Angelina or her intentions, but I wouldn't interpret that as "baiting." I would see it as an opportunity if I wanted to take it. But that's just me. :)

xMiSsCrOfTx
09-01-07, 21:47
It's been long enough, and Jennifer needs to accept the fact that Brad has moved on and so should she. I guess I'm not one to judge, though, seeing as I don't know Jennifer, Angelina or Brad. But seriously. There's a fine line between being upset or hurt and being downright pathetic.

Yuna´s Wish
09-01-07, 22:02
Why doesn´t she accept the facts? I mean, you lost. Give up.

Lara Croft!
10-01-07, 00:27
She said Angelina is pretty much the last person on the planet she would want to meet.“She says nothing could be gained from meeting up - she certainly doesn’t want to compare notes about Brad.


Hey....she's got a point!!Why would they meet?So that Aniston will feel better or Jolie make ends meet with her?





Sure, no one can deny that what happened was not exactly great for Jen, and sure she should be hurting...but she's just downright hateful it seems.


You said it yourself..."It seems".Probably all those are rumors...I don't blame Angelina for having Brad...But if she really wanted to meet Jennifer,then she is the one being ridiculous...

Laurencarter
10-01-07, 15:24
Why can't Jennifer just get over the past, forget it and move on?

RedTyga
11-01-07, 00:22
I don't see how Angie said anything wrong. She didn't even bring it up, the interviewer did. They asked her if she was willing to meet Jen and she just said yeah, if Jen wanted to meet she'd be down with it. Why is Jen so angry about that? They make it seem like she said she wanted to meet Jen and bond or some bull crap.

Hypnosos
11-01-07, 05:28
How can it be that Jennifer has to move on when it's Jolie who's asking to meet Aniston, and not the other way around?

Mary CF
11-01-07, 06:05
you know, I don't usually get caught up in this Hollywood crap, but I think Aniston is ridiculous.

Sure, no one can deny that what happened was not exactly great for Jen, and sure she should be hurting...but she's just downright hateful it seems. I seriously doubt Angelina is purposely trying to hurt her...even from a cold cynical view - She's already taken her man, what else can she do? What else would she do? Angelina is happy and has a family, Jen is not and doesn't have a family. Maybe she should get over like everyone else in Hollywood does, and find another husband to have a life with, lmao.

People just really make me angry...I suppose that's why I don't pay attention (usually :p) to the silly drama of Hollywood, lol.

I think the whole thing is pathetic and shouldn't be in the news. People should keep private issues private. I think that's kind of pointless for celebrities though, and they do like to keep themselves in the headlines at least occasionally, despite any claims to the contrary they may make.

That said, I believe she has every right to be angry at her. Angelina pretty much admitted that she purposefully broke up their marriage by 'realizing' she and Brad to be together etc etc blah blah blah.

There's nothing to talk about. I don't see how she could possibly make her feel any better with anything that she might plan to say. Anything she could possibly say would be like rubbing salt in the wound. It's like trying to console someone after a relative dies - there's really nothing positive to say. In this case, Brad would be the deceased and Angelina would be like Death.

Would you actually want to have a conversation with Death if he/she killed the love of your life? It's a figure of speech, of course, but please. I don't think so. You'd probably want to scream at them, punch them in the face and oh, maybe light them on fire, or something like that. Surely you wouldn't sit there bawling on their shoulder and asking them why your love had to go. No way.

All you can do is move on, but I guess Angelina is not smart enough to realize that. There's nothing she can do to help. She's just trying to make herself look like less of a man-stealing witch, and I'm not buying it. I'm guessing she's trying to get in a better spot with Brad's parents (I've heard they don't get along very well... no big surprise).

It's quite easy to say that her motives for saying that weren't for Jen's own good, as she would no doubt like us to believe.

Enough is enough. They should all just stop talking about it and move on.

larasfrend
11-01-07, 08:52
I honestly never take any of these things seriously and my advice to you all is not to do so either. Most of the time these stories are completely thought up by the media without a bit of truth in them. I seriously doubt Jennifer Aniston hates Jolie or vice versa. They're both adults and Jennifer knows that Brad and Angelina were not having an affair while they were still together.

larasfrend
11-01-07, 08:54
Angelina pretty much admitted that she purposefully broke up their marriage by 'realizing' she and Brad to be together etc etc blah blah blah.
Where did she admit this?:confused: (I'm not challenging your statement, but I think I missed out on this)

danitiwa
11-01-07, 11:47
I think Jen is overreacting, you shouldn't listen to every rumor you hear. :)

Lara Croft!
11-01-07, 12:40
you shouldn't listen to every rumor you hear. :) ......exactly......

Psyched
11-01-07, 15:24
Haha, celebrities. It's funny because we normal people give their pathetic little lives so much attention.

Aniston shouldn't be so stuck-up. She's not the centre of the universe. It's nice to see that Angelina at least made some effort.

TR 4ever
11-01-07, 17:19
Aniston must understand that the GAME IS OVER. She don't own Brad anymore! Now he's Angie's!

Mary CF
12-01-07, 06:05
Aniston must understand that the GAME IS OVER. She don't own Brad anymore! Now he's Angie's!

When did she ever say she owned him? You can't quote that, because no one with any real information has ever said that.

I doubt she's angry at Angelina for 'owning' him. You're making assumptions based on information that none of us have.

Where did she admit this?:confused: (I'm not challenging your statement, but I think I missed out on this)

I would question it too if I were you, except I read it in an article somewhere. I can't quote the source exactly, but I'm sure if you look it up you'll find it. Maybe I'll look for it on the weekend when I have more time.

Tthe Spirit
12-01-07, 16:50
Angie= goodwill ambassador...
the life angelina is living and her role in unhcr influence her much and that's a a good way of life...
in the end, every will die and there is a judgment day...
i mean, no 1 should be mad at another...
there's a god... so comeon Jen... think wisely of it...
by the way, angie isnt dying to befriend you... she is just a good will ambassador..
remeber this: Good will........

buffytabor
12-01-07, 18:46
I don't think they should have a sit down, that is weird. It is ok for Angie to say she would sit down and chat with Jenn but totally understandable that Jenn wouldn't want to. I know I wouldn't. Jenn and Angie both seem very sweet. I think they both need to be given a break.

Scottlee
12-01-07, 19:24
It must be tough being Brad Pitt. First he gets Anniston in her prime, and now Jolie.

TR 4ever
12-01-07, 21:09
When did she ever say she owned him? You can't quote that, because no one with any real information has ever said that.
I doubt she's angry at Angelina for 'owning' him. You're making assumptions based on information that none of us have.

Ok! Ok!
Aniston must understand that the GAME IS OVER. Brab isn't with her anymore. He's with Angie.

AnthonyShock1515
12-01-07, 21:18
Aniston was right to shove her off. But I think Jen should just let it rest now, theres nothing she can do to get her husband back.

Life goes on...
and on...
and on and on...



..........and on....

AmericanAssassin
12-01-07, 21:19
I'm definately on Angelina's side. She isn't the one who left Jen. Brad is. Angelina is, by far, the better person of the two. I mean, she actually gives 1/3 of her total salary to children in Africa. She's a model citizen. Sexy, giving, rich, famous...the perfect woman.

No wonder they had her play Lara Croft...:D

dark_angel_7
13-01-07, 18:16
I'm definately on Angelina's side. She isn't the one who left Jen. Brad is. Angelina is, by far, the better person of the two. I mean, she actually gives 1/3 of her total salary to children in Africa. She's a model citizen. Sexy, giving, rich, famous...the perfect woman.

No wonder they had her play Lara Croft...:D

Well said! :D

Lenochka
13-01-07, 21:57
Jennifer Aniston needs to get over it already gosh... she is fricken annoying and is only doing this so she stays in the news since friends is over and she has gone down in the A list popularity ranking.

Catlantean
13-01-07, 22:29
I think she has every right to be angry, if someone stole my husband I wouldn't want to hang out with them either. Not if I was over it, not ever. It's just not the kind of thing you can ever forgive.

But the whole thing sounds like a misinterpretation by the media, surely Angelina saying that she would meet Jennifer if Jennifer wanted to doesn't mean she wants to meet her and is actually inviting her.

domina
13-01-07, 23:42
People can't be "stolen." They're not property, and shy of some improbable love potion, it's not like you can fault a woman when it's your husband/boyfriend who desires her. Jennifer can surely be angry at Angie for attempting to seduce her husband when Jolie obviously knew they were together, but the end result was Brad's choice. If Jen wants to be mad at someone, it'd make more sense for her to be mad at Brad.

AmericanAssassin
13-01-07, 23:43
I think she has every right to be angry, if someone stole my husband I wouldn't want to hang out with them either. Not if I was over it, not ever. It's just not the kind of thing you can ever forgive.

But the whole thing sounds like a misinterpretation by the media, surely Angelina saying that she would meet Jennifer if Jennifer wanted to doesn't mean she wants to meet her and is actually inviting her.

Read my comment a few posts up. People with sanity still in them couldn't disagree.

Legends
14-01-07, 00:32
Angelina is just trying to save her own reputation, not solve any problems she may have with Jennifer.
This is selfish of Angelina, not Jennifer.

Ivana belara
14-01-07, 03:26
I think that Jen and Brad's marriage was already troubled, way before they even started making Mr. & Mrs. Smith.
As for the stolen part - we are faced with temptation every day, if their marriage was strong, Brad wouldn't have been tempted. It takes rare people to survive a Hollywood marriage.
American Assassin totally agree with you. How many other celebs do what AJ is doing. If she signed a deal for a movie that was 20 mil. Just think about how much 1/3 would be. Not to mention getting right down and dirty. Putting herself in danger, or getting some kind of disease.

Maybe she wants to talk to her and make Jen the Godmother of her and Brad's next child. OOPPPSSS did I type that out loud!

Miss Golden
14-01-07, 23:41
You can't really blame Angelina really. I mean Aniston was not giving Brad the love and passion he wanted, so he looked elsewhere. Angelina just happened to be the one to provide that comfort. Aniston should have been a better wife.

AmericanAssassin
14-01-07, 23:45
You can't really blame Angelina really. I mean Aniston was not giving Brad the love and passion he wanted, so he looked elsewhere. Angelina just happened to be the one to provide that comfort. Aniston should have been a better wife.

Exactly, somebody that understands!

Catlantean
15-01-07, 00:43
Read my comment a few posts up. People with sanity still in them couldn't disagree.

Sure Brad is more to blame, and it's not impossible that he and Jennifer had serious marriage problems before he started cheating on her...but still, none of that means that Angelina and Jennifer should be friends, or even not dislike one another.

And please don't make assumptions about my sanity.

Pipolinne
15-01-07, 02:18
You can't really blame Angelina really. I mean Aniston was not giving Brad the love and passion he wanted, so he looked elsewhere. Angelina just happened to be the one to provide that comfort. Aniston should have been a better wife.


A better wife??! What a sexist expression!

No one knows why they broke up and no one knows why Brad and Angelina decided to start a relationship!
And,IMO,that does not concern us,either.

I totally understand Jennifer Aniston refusing Angelina Jolie's invitation: she was betrayed.But I understand Jolie's action,too: if Aniston has a good relationship with Pitt,the only one who cheated and betrayed,perhaps it would be more civilized to have a polite relationship with Jolie. For someone who almost got married to another bloke,Aniston still feels a lot of anger concerning Jolie.

But that's very easy to say,of course .

AmericanAssassin
15-01-07, 04:29
Sure Brad is more to blame, and it's not impossible that he and Jennifer had serious marriage problems before he started cheating on her...but still, none of that means that Angelina and Jennifer should be friends, or even not dislike one another.

And please don't make assumptions about my sanity.

I don't think they should be friends. That's unrealistic. I just think that all of you Angelina-haters should grow up. She did NOTHING wrong. Brad did. That's all I meant. And, that IS the truth. Not a matter of opinion.

DREWY
15-01-07, 05:03
Both to blame, takes two to tango. Thats just my opinion.
Hard for celebrities to find a lasting relationship when they are looking in a reduced pool of partners though.

Catlantean
15-01-07, 17:55
I don't think they should be friends. That's unrealistic. I just think that all of you Angelina-haters should grow up. She did NOTHING wrong. Brad did. That's all I meant. And, that IS the truth. Not a matter of opinion.

Where did I ever say I hated Angelina? I respect her for being a great actress and for her charity work, and as for her personal life, that's her affair. I just said that it is perfectly natural for Jennifer to not want to meet her, and it doesn't make her evil or "not over it", or whatever (and I think what Angelina said was more for politeness' sake than an open invitation). I don't know or care about her personal life, or Brad's, or Jennifer's, enough to point a finger and say "Aha, he/she's the guilty one!" - and unless you're a good friend of one of them and closely informed about the situation, neither should you.

angelika
16-01-07, 07:11
Jennifer was very reasonable ( take it from a person who doesn't like her)

Angie has nothing to say to her and Jen has no reason to meet with her.
Tell her what? Sorry to steal your man? She 's not sorry, why would she say that?

I don't see why Angie wanted to meet her in the first place.......:confused:

Night_Heaven
16-01-07, 10:30
Oh c'mon...Angelina want to be seen as a good person and all.She is soo selfish. She stole Brad from Jenifer and Jenifer is right not to meet with Angelina ..bah...She really is a character not like Angelina.

Autolycus
16-01-07, 11:31
Well said, I totally agree :tmb: . Jenifer needs to get these words into her head - GET OVER IT!!! I hate her. Angelina + Brad + Kids = happy family so stop trying to ruin evrything for them. Angelina is just trying to be kind for god sakes so what if she took your man. You weren't a great couple anyway IMO.

GET OVER IT!
Come on guys Jennifer has got a right to be ****ed off, for god sake she's had her world blown appart by whats gone on, and in no way is it her fault. The people who are to blame are AJ and Brad. So supposibly AJ wants to meet up and clear the air and Jennifer doesn't want to know, wow big shock what did AJ expect.

For god sake leave the poor woman alone!.

Lenochka
16-01-07, 22:48
Oh c'mon...Angelina want to be seen as a good person and all.She is soo selfish. She stole Brad from Jenifer and Jenifer is right not to meet with Angelina ..bah...She really is a character not like Angelina.

:vlol: there we go again with stealing... Brad is nobodies property... he left Jennifer... he wasn't as happy with her. Why should he be stuck with less then when he can be with someone who makes him happy?

AmericanAssassin
16-01-07, 23:41
Here's what happened: Jen was ***** and didn't want to have kids with Brad, in fear of gaining weight. Brad left her, got with Angie, and is now living happily with three little kids! The only person in the wrong in this situation is Jen for being so selfish to Brad. He had every right to leave her. As for "stealing," I don't think so. You can't steal somebody. He left her on his own terms! When it comes to wanting to meet, that's kinda weird. However, Angie is a good person and probably wanted ***** Jen to understand that she didn't "steal" Brad.

Angie is a good person. She adopted two orphan children, takes care of them, and has given 1/3 of her life makings to other orphans. Jen probably spends all of her money on getting her nails redone every other day.

Mr.LadyCroft
17-01-07, 02:18
Here's what happened: Jen was ***** and didn't want to have kids with Brad, in fear of gaining weight. Brad left her, got with Angie, and is now living happily with three little kids! The only person in the wrong in this situation is Jen for being so selfish to Brad. He had every right to leave her. As for "stealing," I don't think so. You can't steal somebody. He left her on his own terms! When it comes to wanting to meet, that's kinda weird. However, Angie is a good person and probably wanted ***** Jen to understand that she didn't "steal" Brad.

Angie is a good person. She adopted two orphan children, takes care of them, and given 1/3 of her life makings to other orphans. Jen probably spend all of her money on getting her nails redone every other day.

amen. i like Angelina Jolie a whole bunch more then Jen. i agree with all of that. Angie didn't "steal" Brad from Jen. Brad left Jen. and he looks a lot happier with Angie anways. and i heard rumors that Brad and Jen weren't even happy together before Angie even came into the picture. and yea i think that's good that Angelina wanted to talk to Jen about it because she's mature and doesn't want dumb rumors about her being spread about her stealing Brad from Jen. but Jen i guess really isn't as mature about the situation. but i LOVE Angelina NO matter what and i think she's in the RIGHT and Jen's in the WRONG. but that' my opinion. :D

Mary CF
17-01-07, 18:53
I'm definately on Angelina's side. She isn't the one who left Jen. Brad is. Angelina is, by far, the better person of the two. I mean, she actually gives 1/3 of her total salary to children in Africa. She's a model citizen. Sexy, giving, rich, famous...the perfect woman.

No wonder they had her play Lara Croft...:D


Well said! :D

You two must both be in a freaking time warp.

Angelina's transformation into manstealing-humanitarian-goodwill ambassador didn't occur until AFTER she starred in the first tombraider movie. Cambodia is where she adopted Maddox, and where she started caring about little orphans and third world blah blah blah.

Before that, she was just a knife and blood obsessed brother-frenching weirdo. Oh, and she already had the man-stealing thing down.

I get that men can't be 'stolen'. But you can say that if Angelina didn't want him, he wouldn't have left Jen for her. He might have eventually, but not right then.

I don't think they should be friends. That's unrealistic. I just think that all of you Angelina-haters should grow up. She did NOTHING wrong. Brad did. That's all I meant. And, that IS the truth. Not a matter of opinion.

I think you need to stop assuming things and making blanket statements about opinions you don't fully understand. None of us have any idea what really happened. There is no way to evaluate anyone's opinion properly because all we have is garbage speculation from the media and so-called 'sources' - and what I regard as a direct confession from Angelina, but I digress.

You can't say she's innocent, because you don't know what she did or didn't do. Neither do I or any of us. I do know one thing: after seeing Angelina involved in the demise of at least two relationships, I've lost a significant amount of respect for her.

AmericanAssassin
19-01-07, 22:25
^ That's crap! ^

star girl
21-01-07, 15:04
I'm sorry, I am with Angelina ... She seems a better person than Jennifer. But Jennifer is creating a fuss of nothing, after FRIENDS, her career took up a major downfall. She had Brad, the only thing she had worthy of some media attraction was Brad. Now she lost him. Then the guy in "break-up".... No wonder she's so ticked off with Angelina's "peace" proposal... :)

AmericanAssassin
21-01-07, 16:35
Angie RULES!!! Jen DROOLS!!! :vlol:

Dmoney
22-01-07, 04:44
I wish Jen would go away. She mad she don't have the looks or the skillz Angie has.:D

chambs1
22-01-07, 22:45
Me neither... although, if I was in Jen's shoes, I'd probably tell Angie to go to hell, too. (Although I'd probably just blow up her car instead... :p) I wouldn't want to be in the same room as the woman who stole my husband, let alone talk to her and have to be friendly...

People don't 'steal' eachother's mates. It takes two.

Dmoney
23-01-07, 03:11
People don't 'steal' eachother's mates. It takes two.

Right. Brad probably wanted an upgrade.;)

AmericanAssassin
23-01-07, 03:13
Right. Brad probably wanted an upgrade.;)
:tmb: Good call!!!

Hey, I just heard that Angie is now working to save the enviroment too! Another point for Angie!

Angie: 5,678,923 points
Jen: 0 points

Dmoney
23-01-07, 03:34
Now thats a blow out!:jmp:

Ultimate_Lara
23-01-07, 04:01
They've been making up so much :cen: about Ange and I wish they'd leave her alone! Angelina wouldn't say anything like that unless she was put under pressure, which she was by vogue!! :mad:

Mary CF
23-01-07, 08:57
^ That's crap! ^

Good response, just like all your other ridiculous posts. Another reason why I usually refuse to debate with most people on this forum - you have proven yourself completely incapable of carrying out a rational conversation.

Doesn't work for you? "That's crap!" How pathetic. You sound like a three year old who watches too many cartoons. You can't even refute the points, you just can't hack it.

I'm done with you. Bye!

Dmoney
24-01-07, 02:46
Okay lets simmer down people:wve:

DREWY
24-01-07, 04:06
Come on Mary settle down. (Where have you been, don't see you round much lately.)
AA, you probably could have phrased that a little bit better.

Remember everyone has an opinion. They are all different and we are all entitled to have one. I don't expect anyone to change theirs because of "thats crap", or anything else thats written here. So please, lets keep it civil with our posts and replies please, ok :wve:

Dmoney
24-01-07, 05:11
Good response, just like all your other ridiculous posts. Another reason why I usually refuse to debate with most people on this forum - you have proven yourself completely incapable of carrying out a rational conversation.

Doesn't work for you? "That's crap!" How pathetic. You sound like a three year old who watches too many cartoons. You can't even refute the points, you just can't hack it.

I'm done with you. Bye!

Your a Jenny fan aren't you?:ton:

DREWY
24-01-07, 05:36
No. I don't think Mary is a "Jenny fan" necessarily. She just doesn't see Angelina Jolie with rose colored glasses as many here do.
Sure she's done some good things, she also done some not so good things. But none of us know her well enough to know where they cross over.

Mary CF
24-01-07, 06:03
No. I don't think Mary is a "Jenny fan" necessarily. She just doesn't see Angelina Jolie with rose colored glasses as many here do.
Sure she's done some good things, she also done some not so good things. But none of us know her well enough to know where they cross over.

Thank you Drewy! I couldn't have said it better myself. :hug:

I'm definitely not an Aniston fan. I don't have any reason to love or hate her, in fact. What was that show.. Friends? I didn't care for it much.

As for my previous post, said what I felt I needed to be said. I have nothing further to add. So, thanks for the warning, and rest assured that you have nothing to worry about - future posts from that individual won't even register to me. :)

Atlantean-Squid
24-01-07, 13:53
I usually don't care much for celeb gossip, but I really can't help myself here.

Why should Aniston have to "accept" that it's over between her and Pitt now? Is the destruction of a relationship something you can just "get over" these days? Is it WRONG to be angry at the person who stole your partner? Helping starving children in third-world countries is all well and good, but it is the true moral challenges in life (ie. having the decency and self-control to NOT run off with someone else's husband just because you can) which seperate the good people on the planet from those who just appear so.

For the sake of communication, I will lower myself to the intellect level of the majority of the posters here and say it like this: Jennifer Aniston is better looking than Angelina Jolie.

domina
24-01-07, 16:14
I usually don't care much for celeb gossip, but I really can't help myself here.

Why should Aniston have to "accept" that it's over between her and Pitt now? Is the destruction of a relationship something you can just "get over" these days? Is it WRONG to be angry at the person who stole your partner? Helping starving children in third-world countries is all well and good, but it is the true moral challenges in life (ie. having the decency and self-control to NOT run off with someone else's husband just because you can) which seperate the good people on the planet from those who just appear so.

For the sake of communication, I will lower myself to the intellect level of the majority of the posters here and say it like this: Jennifer Aniston is better looking than Angelina Jolie.

This is the sort of statement that bugs me, and it doesn't even have to relate to Jolie and Aniston, but since that's the context we're going with, I'm going to work with that. Jolie did NOT steal Pitt. You can't "steal" somebody because people in a relationship aren't property. She could have seduced him, tried to get him to fall for her, etc. but no one can actually take someone's boyfriend or girlfriend away without the consent of said boyfriend/girlfriend. Pitt made the ultimate decision, not Jolie.

This isn't to say Aniston isn't without her reasons to be angry at Jolie, but damn. Brad was the one who left, and I haven't heard **** about Aniston being mad at him. It always comes down to Aniston vs. Jolie. That's probably is a result of our lovely entertainment media looking for a catfight, but complaints that Jolie stole Pitt makes her an evil person are no more legitimate than saying "She does work for the third country. That means she's a great person."

Ward Dragon
24-01-07, 21:12
I have absolutely no interest in Hollywood or celebrities outside of just watching TV/movies. I usually don't comment on these sorts of things, but I'm really bored right now :p Anyhow, I don't like either actress (I thought Friends was one of the dumbest shows ever, and pretty much everything about Angelina Jolie is weird in a bad way). Having said that, based upon this article I'd say that Jennifer is in the right. If she was stalking Angelina or sending death threats, then I'd say she should just get over it. However, that's not the case. She's really angry that she lost her husband (note I didn't say "stole" ;)) and even more so that the freaking media keeps harping on it. Then on top of that, Angelina is pretending to be a good person (I really do think it's all just an act) and laying all of the blame for the animosity at Jennifer's feet. That's not right. I'll bet Jennifer is really angry at Brad too, but the media would rather see a fight between her and Angelina so that's what's reported. Long story short, the media needs to worry about more important things and stop dragging these people's petty lives out into public view all the time :rolleyes:

Atlantean-Squid
25-01-07, 14:46
She could have seduced him, tried to get him to fall for her, etc
That's precisely what I meant by "stealing". It isn't relevant to the thread how Pitt comes in to it. As someone said before, it takes two to tango.

Brad was the one who left, and I haven't heard **** about Aniston being mad at him. It always comes down to Aniston vs. Jolie.
She probably IS angry with him, but again, it's completely outside the scope of this article and thread.

AmericanAssassin
25-01-07, 18:22
Good response, just like all your other ridiculous posts. Another reason why I usually refuse to debate with most people on this forum - you have proven yourself completely incapable of carrying out a rational conversation.

Doesn't work for you? "That's crap!" How pathetic. You sound like a three year old who watches too many cartoons. You can't even refute the points, you just can't hack it.

I'm done with you. Bye!
My other rediculous posts? What's that supposed to mean? I provide fact, you provide (laughable) fiction. Who's pathic? You have no idea what you're talking about and pretend that you rule the world when you don't.

DON'T EVER TELL ME I'M PATHETIC OR ANYTHING OF THAT SORT!!! :mad: What a joke!

domina
25-01-07, 19:01
That's precisely what I meant by "stealing". It isn't relevant to the thread how Pitt comes in to it. As someone said before, it takes two to tango.




I disagree. Brad's role in this situation is entirely relevant to the thread, the article, and the conflict on a whole. If Jolie had been throwing herself at him and he was unresponsive to her advances, this drama wouldn't even exist. It was his decision that brought of all this to forefront, thereby not only making it relevant, but incredibly significant.

And I find the that use "it takes two to tango" only solidifies that significance because this wouldn't even be an issue if he didn't take his role in the dance, as it were.

Atlantean-Squid
25-01-07, 22:58
I disagree. Brad's role in this situation is entirely relevant to the thread, the article, and the conflict on a whole. If Jolie had been throwing herself at him and he was unresponsive to her advances, this drama wouldn't even exist. It was his decision that brought of all this to forefront, thereby not only making it relevant, but incredibly significant.

And I find the that use "it takes two to tango" only solidifies that significance because this wouldn't even be an issue if he didn't take his role in the dance, as it were.

True, but the article doesn't discuss this issue. It wasn't Brad Pitt who said he wanted to make up with Aniston (or whatever the article states), it was Jolie. I think both of them are equally to blame, but that's outside the scope of this thread.

AmericanAssassin
26-01-07, 23:12
I disagree. Brad's role in this situation is entirely relevant to the thread, the article, and the conflict on a whole. If Jolie had been throwing herself at him and he was unresponsive to her advances, this drama wouldn't even exist. It was his decision that brought of all this to forefront, thereby not only making it relevant, but incredibly significant.

And I find the that use "it takes two to tango" only solidifies that significance because this wouldn't even be an issue if he didn't take his role in the dance, as it were.

Angie did not throw herself at him. She's a very classy woman, as her family have friends have stated. Classy women don't do such things!

domina
26-01-07, 23:39
Angie did not throw herself at him. She's a very classy woman, as her family have friends have stated. Classy women don't do such things!

Uhm. Okay. I never said she did. :)

AmericanAssassin
26-01-07, 23:40
Uhm. Okay. I never said she did. :)

LOL!!! Sorry, I misread your post! My bad!

Dmoney
28-01-07, 00:19
Okay lets end this. Angie > Jenny. The End;)

AmericanAssassin
28-01-07, 00:32
Okay lets end this. Angie > Jenny. The End;)
:tmb:

Mary CF
28-01-07, 00:48
My other rediculous posts? What's that supposed to mean? I provide fact, you provide (laughable) fiction. Who's pathic? You have no idea what you're talking about and pretend that you rule the world when you don't.

DON'T EVER TELL ME I'M PATHETIC OR ANYTHING OF THAT SORT!!! :mad: What a joke!

Yes that's totally exactly what I did. :rolleyes: You're the one who is acting like they rule the world, buddy. I never said "That's crap!" and acted like that was the defining moment in the conversation. But wait - you did!

It's not fiction, go look it up. Angelina did publicly kiss her brother and she was obssessed with knives. A lot of people were disturbed by the way she kissed her older brother but she seemed to think it was perfectly acceptable. Riiiiight...

If I recall correctly, your way of refuting a point was to make a blanket statement that proves absolutely nothing. That IS pathetic. Also, learn to type. Please.

Have a nice day, okay? I'm not going to waste any more time responding to you.

AmericanAssassin
28-01-07, 00:50
Yes that's totally exactly what I did. :rolleyes:

It's not fiction, go look it up. If I recall correctly, your way of refuting a point was to make a statement that proves absolutely nothing.

Have a nice day, okay?
Do you even realize how rude you are?! :mad:

Mary CF
28-01-07, 00:53
Maybe if you didn't say "that's crap!" and act like your opinion overrules the facts, I wouldn't be this way to you.

Like I said, I'm done. This is my opinion, it is based on facts. Take it or leave it, I don't mind either way.

Destroyer Op 89
28-01-07, 00:56
ive seen this issue for some time now and i never ever gave my impression to anyone on it so i guess this is the only place i could make it.,.if it matters..i believe we cant do anything about it..we can only assume these ppl are happy the way they are now **whether they are in a new relationship and the whole enchilada((mess is what i mean)) or not**

AmericanAssassin
28-01-07, 01:01
Anyway, back on topic:

Angelina Jolie shouldn't have ever invited Jennifer to meet with her. It wasn't her place. Jen was the one that was left (not stolen from). However, Jen shouldn't have reacted as she did to Angelina. From what I've read in magazines and heard on tv, she practically ignored the topic altogether. She could have been more civil. So, when it comes to it, they were both in the wrong on this topic. I will say, however, I'm leaning more toward Angie's side, and not just because she played Lara Croft.

Destroyer Op 89
28-01-07, 01:06
im assuming Jen felt insulted..if she was a bad wife to Brad there isnt anything more horrible than seeing the guy beside ya look on to someone else because you couldnt get it together...im assuming this from what i feel..i would take it myself as...if i was in her shoes...more over they had a child together..something that most of us envision as a real bond/love between the couple...Jen HAD to feel something ya know???... anywho im just stating these on my assumptions..

Dmoney
28-01-07, 01:37
Alright lets settle down people:) This is nothing to fight over;) And Mary you seem a little "on edge"

Destroyer Op 89
28-01-07, 01:39
Alright lets settle down people:) This is nothing to fight over;)
good point...:) celebrities dont fight over our problems lol why should we?