View Full Version : Laras looks:(
Sorry if this has been posted already, but have you noticed her looks, the close ups? It just seems like she isn't as good as she could look, legend's closeups looked far better, the eyebrows and everything, but TRA Lara looks odd,
Maybe these manor, and other screens are of her just not all the way completed (touched up) ?
imo
It's the eyes, they look a bit odd...I think taking 9 and a bit years off her TRL age has made her look a bit weird. But the rest of her looks nice, at least she has fingers and toes (TR1 Lara didn't - polygon limitations).:D
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 21:57
I think she looks splendid. Better than Legend and quite true to the original Lara.
Sekhraider
24-04-07, 21:58
I think her eyebrows are too short and a little fuzzy. They should've kept the TRL's eyebrows:o
Hyper_Crazy
24-04-07, 21:59
I think she looks splendid. Better than Legend and quite true to the original Lara.
I agree.
I think she looks splendid. Better than Legend and quite true to the original Lara.
Yeah, I guess they didn't want her to look like legend Lara, cause, were kind of playing her past, so I guess she looks fine, now that you said that:o
And did they say that they changed her to look like the original one?
BTW her head looks skinnier! LMAO.!
Sekhraider, i know, maybe her eye brows are being worked on??? They look awful
I think her eyebrows are too short and a little fuzzy. They should've kept the TRL's eyebrows:o
I liked the arched eyebrows from Legend, I wish they would've kept it. I don't really like the thinning out brows she's got in Anniversary.
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 22:03
Those recent screenshots of the mansion are nothing to consider since they´re beta screenshots and Lara isn´t as beautiful as she actually is in other pics. Those pics are rather glitchy:p
They have got the physique correct, but she looks too young, whereas TR1 Lara was all woman (for a polygon restricted avatar lol).:D I guess lots of people will enjoy dressing her up etc.
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 22:18
I don´t know...in TR1 she was a girl, not a woman...I mean, she was 27/28 (depending on if it was after or before february). I think she looks 27 years old now too.
I think she looks amazing!! Very reminiscent of the original!:jmp:
I don´t know...in TR1 she was a girl, not a woman...I mean, she was 27/28 (depending on if it was after or before february). I think she looks 27 years old now too.
TRA Lara does not look late twenties, no way...she has been 're-imagined'
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 22:32
So how many years do you think this "Re-imagination" has?
EDIT: I´m really sorry. I should have used "is" instead of "has"...this is unforgivable (even unforgettable)!
So how many years do you think this "Re-imagination" has?
I think she looks late teens or early twenties, at most...it really doesn't matter as long as the game is good and difficult, BUT I'd rather it was faithful to TR1. :)
coolaideonfire
24-04-07, 22:38
I think she looks great!
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 22:41
I think she looks late teens or early twenties, at most...it really doesn't matter as long as the game is good and difficult, BUT I'd rather it was faithful to TR1. :)
I´ll tell my sister you said that. She´s 26 and she´s really similar to this Lara. She´ll be happy thinking she seems to be a teen or an early twenties girl :p
Anniversary Lara
24-04-07, 22:41
I don't like her eyebrows either. And in case they changed her lips back into pink, I don't like that, too. In Legend she looked perfect. I think I will have to mod her :D
So how many years do you think this "Re-imagination" has?
Lol, that's like Spanish! :D
Lara tiene veinte y tres anos.
Lara has 23 years. XD lol
Sorry...:o I hope I haven't offended you....
I don't like her eyebrows either. And in case they changed her lips back into pink, I don't like that, too. In Legend she looked perfect. I think I will have to mod her :D
I think the model in your avatar is great. If they made her a little more tan then she'd be perfect for Anniversary! :D
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 22:45
Lol, that's like Spanish! :D
Lara tiene veinte y tres anos.
Lara has 23 years. XD lol
Sorry...:o I hope I haven't offended you....
Lol, sorry, you´re completely right! I´m not offended...I just can´t understand why I made such a mistake.
"Lara tiene veintitrés años" is the correct way of saying it :tmb:
Well you know what? It's too late to starting *****ing about it now. Stop criticizing and wait for the final product before passing judgement.
I´ll tell my sister you said that. She´s 26 and she´s really similar to this Lara. She´ll be happy thinking she seems to be a teen or an early twenties girl :p
lol, lucky her to seem so young
Lol, sorry, you´re completely right! I´m not offended...I just can´t understand why I made such a mistake.
It's not a mistake, it's just different from how it's normally said in English. I just thought it was cool the way how a Spanish speaking person speaks similarly in English also.
"Lara tiene veintitrés años" is the correct way of saying it :tmb:
Really? I was taught that it was correct either way.
Anniversary Lara
24-04-07, 22:53
I think the model in your avatar is great. If they made her a little more tan then she'd be perfect for Anniversary! :D
Thanks. That's why I keep that picture :)
Her face isn't as detailed as I originally thought after seeing some of the PC screenshots, but a little better than Legend Lara. I thought her body looked better- more realistic.
Yuna´s Wish
24-04-07, 22:56
Really? I was taught that it was correct either way.
Lol, I´m Argetinian and I speak Spanish:p In Spanish you don´t separate the numbers until you get to the thirties: Treinta y uno, Treinta y dos...until 29 they´re altogether: Veintiséis, Veintisiete, Veinitocho y Veintinueve :p
Lol, sorry for the offtopicness!
thing of dust
24-04-07, 22:59
She looks much better than Legend Lara now. In Legend her face looked really strange from some angles. She looks younger and more like the original Lara and I like her new eyebrows, they were too bushy in Legend.
Lol, I´m Argetinian and I speak Spanish:p In Spanish you don´t separate the numbers until you get to the thirties: Treinta y uno, Treinta y dos...until 29 they´re altogether: Veintiséis, Veintisiete, Veinitocho y Veintinueve :p
Lol, sorry for the offtopicness!
Oh, well I'm learning so you can't blame me for not knowing the correct way. :p My Spanish teacher had told us not to write veinteitres because it confused her because she spoke Italian also. She said it was correct either way and she's Ecuadorian.
On topic: The best Anniversary model would have been the one in AL's avi, if she had been more tan.
Lara's Fan
24-04-07, 23:30
I like the way she looks, CD has done a great job!:tmb:
l think she looks fine, the eyebrows and lip colour are probably different because being younger in TRA she does not wear as much make-up
Those recent screenshots of the mansion are nothing to consider since they´re beta screenshots and Lara isn´t as beautiful as she actually is in other pics. Those pics are rather glitchy:p
I agree! It seems she looks odd on the computer, like the videos, then when I play it on ps2 she looks stunning:confused:
Like when the IC came up with the trex, her face and hair looked faded!:confused:
But I KNOW she will be very impressing on my ps2, I don't know why though
AmericanAssassin
24-04-07, 23:41
I think she looks great and very true to the original. To be honest though, I think Legend Lara looked better. Heck, I think Legend Lara looked better than any other Lara... :p
I think she looks great and very true to the original. To be honest though, I think Legend Lara looked better. Heck, I think Legend Lara looked better than any other Lara... :p
Yep, I agree :tmb:
I think we both think that legend lara does because:
Her darker lips
Darker and thicker eyebrows
Her mature face with great makeup
and the perfect amount of hair not pulled back?
Well atleast I agree with those
Unlike TR1 she looks like she's a female.
Unlike TR1 she looks like she's a female.
I know, thats a plus! And look, she even had a braid, unlike Tr1 when it appeared only in the cutscenes! :vlol:
I know, thats a plus! And look, she even had a braid, unlike Tr1 when it appeared only in the cutscenes! :vlol:
That was hilarious! :vlol: I got so cofused when I was little and playing it. I always tried to get a better look at wtf she has holding her hair!
Anniversary Lara is not very different from Legend Lara, she just looks younger, and has less make up. For the first time I really think Anniversary Lara looks amazing!
:D
http://i18.tinypic.com/43mpoax.jpg
That was hilarious! :vlol: I got so cofused when I was little and playing it. I always tried to get a better look at wtf she has holding her hair!
lmao :vlol:
BoyTRaider
25-04-07, 00:28
I really think she still looks beautiful. :)
I do miss Legend's look though.
Unlike TR1 she looks like she's a female.
Well she looked just fine in Tomb Raider 1 to me, considering the limitations of the hardware at the time
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j215/aussie500/Tomb%201/Lara01.jpg
That screenshot looks soo....oil painting-like. =/ Almost as if it's been touched up in photoshop.
Well she looked just fine in Tomb Raider 1 to me, considering the limitations of the hardware at the time
True... BUT, thank GOD for NEW graphics!:jmp:
HollabackBoy
25-04-07, 01:38
Looking at those latest screenshots of the manor, I'm starting to like Legend Lara's look better... I shouldn't pass judgement until I play the game though. After all, the screenshots were from a beta version, so Lara's look may look polished in the final product.
Yuna´s Wish
25-04-07, 01:42
Yes, they´re ancient. I mean, look at her hair...it´s a disaster...It seems it was made using paint.
Well she looked just fine in Tomb Raider 1 to me, considering the limitations of the hardware at the time
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j215/aussie500/Tomb%201/Lara01.jpg
Yeah, she looks more like a woman there but still a little manish, in these below she def looks like a drag tho.
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/9/95/Tomb_Raider_1_Box.jpg
drag? naaaaw, she's rugged but naturally beautiful. her head's disproportionate to her body though. :P
legend lara looked like somebody's mom...too much makeup. tr1 lara looks way more badass.
They are just looks to me :o ...
Moon-Safari
25-04-07, 04:58
lara has a good masculine/feminine balance. Her movement and body is the opitome of feminism, but her prominent jaw line, thick eyebrows, strong bone structure, and personality, give her that masculine strenght. Too bad its all gone.
She always looked beautiful and I think she still does, but I'm a bit iffy about the eyes and eyebrows, but I just can't exactly point out what's the problem. I trust CD that they will always make her look great :)
- Herb
PirateFromPeru
25-04-07, 05:34
Legend Lara and Anniversary Lara ARE basically the same. If you ever campare them (like most people have done already) they both have the same basic look and facial structure. The only small differences I've noticed are the eyebrows, eyes and even the hair. Anniversary/Legend Lara is the best looking Lara ever. She looks SUPER for a video game chick and just saying that makes me look creepy. :whi:
I think she looks beautiful!:cln:
TRAIDER523
25-04-07, 05:43
Anniversary Lara is not very different from Legend Lara, she just looks younger, and has less make up. For the first time I really think Anniversary Lara looks amazing!
:D
http://i18.tinypic.com/43mpoax.jpg
Well.. Legend Lara is supposed to be younger regardless. Legend happens years before the first TR.. So making Anniversary look younger is just stupid :hea:
PirateFromPeru
25-04-07, 05:48
Well.. Legend Lara is supposed to be younger regardless. Legend happens years before the first TR.. So making Anniversary look younger is just stupid :hea:
Umm, the events in TR1/Anniversary happened before Legend. That's why she's supposed to look younger in Anniversary. ;)
RichieRobson
25-04-07, 05:56
well i think she looks a bit fit :D
spot on CD
I prefer Legend Lara more. her face looks more developed, mature and has more personality and is more attractive; plus I like how her hair falls in front of her face.
She looks not so beautiful as she can look, I don't realy like her colour of skin.
Jordan_Boi
25-04-07, 06:41
She looks perfect. It really shows that she's young again, and a lot different from the Legend model. :)
Well.. Legend Lara is supposed to be younger regardless. Legend happens years before the first TR.. So making Anniversary look younger is just stupid :hea:
No... Anniversary happens before Legend... Isn't Lara's Legend adventure her latest one?
Yeah, she looks more like a woman there but still a little manish, in these below she def looks like a drag tho.
She didn't look manish, she looked masculine. These are two different things. Her breasts were bigger than her body, but at least she didn't have the waist of a 16 years old girl (Legend Lara, cough)
Her face was long and hard lined, whereas Legend Lara's face is round and soft edged, what gives her the doll-ish innuendo. That's why people find Original Lara more mature. Thank god for Core for making her look like a bad ass woman and not like a bimbo.
Also Legend Lara's breasts always gave me the impression that they were pushed up by something invisible, because it's impossible to have bosoms like that.
People shouldn't really comment on the in-game look of TR1 Lara, because it was hard to make a realistic model from 300 polygons in 1996, than using 8.000 polygons in 2006-07. Due to the graphics/engine limitations in 1996, Core couldn't make the braid, but they were able to do it in FMVs.
Anyway, Anniversary Lara looks just fine for me. :)
Anniversary Lara looks great! :)
TRAIDER523
26-04-07, 05:04
Umm, the events in TR1/Anniversary happened before Legend. That's why she's supposed to look younger in Anniversary. ;)
if you want to get technical about it her earliest adventure was when she killed "Bigfoot"... She was 28 yrs. old in TR1 (which Anniversary is not gonna make a difference on her age seeing that its a remake)... And she definitely wasn't older than 28 in Legend. Legend goes back to her roots. :hea: :hea:
People need to play the games from 96 to 07 and pay more attention... CHRONICLES took place before TR1 :ton:
PirateFromPeru
26-04-07, 05:43
if you want to get technical about it her earliest adventure was when she killed "Bigfoot"... She was 28 yrs. old in TR1 (which Anniversary is not gonna make a difference on her age seeing that its a remake)... And she definitely wasn't older than 28 in Legend. Legend goes back to her roots. :hea: :hea:
People need to play the games from 96 to 07 and pay more attention... CHRONICLES took place before TR1 :ton:
TR1/Anniversary did happen before Legend. That's been confirmed. I'd put the link up to where I read that, but I'm too lazy. (somebody correct me if I'm wrong or if they can find proof of this somewhere.)
george_croft
26-04-07, 06:06
She looks great! CD did a great job:)
Originally Posted by TRAIDER523 http://www.tombraiderforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.tombraiderforums.com/showthread.php?p=1760697#post1760697)
if you want to get technical about it her earliest adventure was when she killed "Bigfoot"... She was 28 yrs. old in TR1 (which Anniversary is not gonna make a difference on her age seeing that its a remake)... And she definitely wasn't older than 28 in Legend. Legend goes back to her roots. :hea: :hea:
People need to play the games from 96 to 07 and pay more attention... CHRONICLES took place before TR1 :ton:
Actually Chronicles took place directly after Tomb Raider 4, some of the stories retold in chronicles happened before Tomb Raider 1, and we have no idea when the bigfoot adventure took place, only that it was before Tomb Raider 1. :ton:
TR1/Anniversary did happen before Legend. That's been confirmed. I'd put the link up to where I read that, but I'm too lazy. (somebody correct me if I'm wrong or if they can find proof of this somewhere.)
PirateFromPeru is correct :)
Originally there was only going to be one game, so Lara was 28, it is a bit impractical to have a middle aged Tomb Raider though, so with AOD her year of birth was dropped and she is now ageless. In Anniversary we have been told Lara is in her early twenties, so it is obviously before Legend. If there is still anyone having a comprehension problem the year was included in the hotel cutscene, personally l think they should not have even included that but obviously they thought some people might be a bit confused:rolleyes:
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4618/image1aave2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Tomb Raider has always been a present day adventure unless otherwise stated
TRAIDER523
26-04-07, 19:35
O.K. well someone please find me that link where it says TRA is before TRL because that makes NO sense. And the date that is 1996 in Anniversary is correct like the original and TR2 takes place in 1997 etc. etc.. And I'm assuming the Rome level in CHRONICLES took place before TR1 because Pierre and Larson are in it. :hea: And WHY would legend Lara look soo young if it did not happen before TR1 ?? Just cause it's a remake doesn't mean they changed her age. She is FAAAAAAAAR more advanced in TR1/ ANNIVERSARY than in Legend... :hea: "And yes we do not know when "bigfoot" happened but is before TR1 + TRA.. Maybe she killed him after she brought excalibar back :ton:
She looks perfect. It really shows that she's young again, and a lot different from the Legend model. :)
No... Anniversary happens before Legend... Isn't Lara's Legend adventure her latest one?
And NO Legend isn't her latest one... Legend went back to Lara's roots... That's why she's so young looking :D
Actually Chronicles took place directly after Tomb Raider 4, some of the stories retold in chronicles happened before Tomb Raider 1, and we have no idea when the bigfoot adventure took place, only that it was before Tomb Raider 1. :ton:
I KNOW that the Chronicles game takes place after TR 4, but not the events. AND if in fact they are making this game take place before Legend, then that is pointless because she is far more advanced in TR1, not a little youngen.. :cen:
Well she looked just fine in Tomb Raider 1 to me, considering the limitations of the hardware at the time
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j215/aussie500/Tomb%201/Lara01.jpgLOL. I'd forgotten how bad she looked back then. I can't believe people wanted to see her naked.
Just goes to show how far computers have come.
@Angel_14: I love your avatar. Where did you get that?
I have no complaints regarding her in-game looks.
However, I'm still not sold on the renders (although the animated one on the official website is nice).
bloodstormaoa
26-04-07, 23:32
I think TRA Lara is the best Lara in ages:D
PirateFromPeru
26-04-07, 23:55
And WHY would legend Lara look soo young if it did not happen before TR1 ?? Just cause it's a remake doesn't mean they changed her age. She is FAAAAAAAAR more advanced in TR1/ ANNIVERSARY than in Legend... :hea: "And yes we do not know when "bigfoot" happened but is before TR1 + TRA.. Maybe she killed him after she brought excalibar back :ton:
But she didn't have excaliber then. That whole story doesn't even take place yet. And how is she more advanced in TR1/Anniversary than in Legend (considering she has all the high-tech gadgets in Legend.) :confused:
And NO Legend isn't her latest one... Legend went back to Lara's roots... That's why she's so young looking :D
Legend is her latest adventure. It's not going back to her roots and she doesn't look any younger than she has in the past games, only better due to updated graphics. Like aussie said, she's officially ageless. :tmb:
PirateFromPeru is correct :)
Originally there was only going to be one game, so Lara was 28, it is a bit impractical to have a middle aged Tomb Raider though, so with AOD her year of birth was dropped and she is now ageless. In Anniversary we have been told Lara is in her early twenties, so it is obviously before Legend. If there is still anyone having a comprehension problem the year was included in the hotel cutscene, personally l think they should not have even included that but obviously they thought some people might be a bit confused:rolleyes:
Tomb Raider has always been a present day adventure unless otherwise stated
Thank you aussie! :tmb: And I agree with you.
I KNOW that the Chronicles game takes place after TR 4, but not the events. AND if in fact they are making this game take place before Legend, then that is pointless because she is far more advanced in TR1, not a little youngen.. :cen:
How is it pointless? :confused: And again, how is she a 'little youngen' in Legend? And how is she more advanced in TR1/Anniversary? :confused:
Looking at those latest screenshots of the manor, I'm starting to like Legend Lara's look better... I shouldn't pass judgement until I play the game though. After all, the screenshots were from a beta version, so Lara's look may look polished in the final product.
Of course they will
I KNOW that the Chronicles game takes place after TR 4, but not the events. AND if in fact they are making this game take place before Legend, then that is pointless because she is far more advanced in TR1, not a little youngen.. :cen:
Since Legend occurred in 2006 and Tomb Raider 1/Anniversary occurs in 1996 l do not see why there is any trouble understanding when the games take place. The flash back scenes in Legend were earlier than Tomb Raider 1. Lara has more advanced equipment in Legend than in any other previous game, and yet in Anniversary she only has low tech equipment, we are told they tried to make her 10 years younger, she is supposedly in her early twenties (true the numbers do not add up there), and the story is a retelling of the original adventure. Honestly why is it so hard to comprehend that this adventure takes place way before Legend. All they have done is update the graphics and gameplay, changed Lara's age, and gone into more detail on the story, it is still the search for the Atlantean Scion
PirateFromPeru
27-04-07, 02:58
Since Legend occurred in 2006 and Tomb Raider 1/Anniversary occurs in 1996 l do not see why there is any trouble understanding when the games take place. The flash back scenes in Legend were earlier than Tomb Raider 1. Lara has more advanced equipment in Legend than in any other previous game, and yet in Anniversary she only has low tech equipment, we are told they tried to make her 10 years younger, she is supposedly in her early twenties (true the numbers do not add up there), and the story is a retelling of the original adventure. Honestly why is it so hard to comprehend that this adventure takes place way before Legend. All they have done is update the graphics and gameplay, changed Lara's age, and gone into more detail on the story, it is still the search for the Atlantean Scion
I couldn't have said it any better. :tmb:
TRAIDER523
27-04-07, 05:16
:hea: Since Legend occurred in 2006 and Tomb Raider 1/Anniversary occurs in 1996 l do not see why there is any trouble understanding when the games take place. The flash back scenes in Legend were earlier than Tomb Raider 1. Lara has more advanced equipment in Legend than in any other previous game, and yet in Anniversary she only has low tech equipment, we are told they tried to make her 10 years younger, she is supposedly in her early twenties (true the numbers do not add up there), and the story is a retelling of the original adventure. Honestly why is it so hard to comprehend that this adventure takes place way before Legend. All they have done is update the graphics and gameplay, changed Lara's age, and gone into more detail on the story, it is still the search for the Atlantean Scion
NO kidding !!!! Must have taken a lot to write ALL of that for NO reason.. Someone's smart.. I KNOW LEGEND was MADE in 2006.. Does NOT mean it takes place in 2006 smart *$$... And the flashbacks were earlier than TR1 ?? NO waaaay.. She was like 9.. OBVIOUSLY genius... So maybe it IS a little HARD to comprehend. Stop acting like I started playing TR yesterday. I been playing it since it came out year by year and know everything.. Just don't understand why they would make her younger than the original and make it occur BEFORE LEGEND.. But I know this might be a little hard to comprehend... And I KNOW it's the same storyline.. :hea: :hea: :cen:
Since Legend occurred in 2006 and Tomb Raider 1/Anniversary occurs in 1996 l do not see why there is any trouble understanding when the games take place. The flash back scenes in Legend were earlier than Tomb Raider 1. Lara has more advanced equipment in Legend than in any other previous game, and yet in Anniversary she only has low tech equipment, we are told they tried to make her 10 years younger, she is supposedly in her early twenties (true the numbers do not add up there), and the story is a retelling of the original adventure. Honestly why is it so hard to comprehend that this adventure takes place way before Legend. All they have done is update the graphics and gameplay, changed Lara's age, and gone into more detail on the story, it is still the search for the Atlantean Scion
Hey Lara's holding up pretty good for 38 if Legend really is set in 2006.
It gives us 30 somethings lots of hope. :D
Tthe Spirit
27-04-07, 06:50
She looks terribly ugly...
Maybe this Lara is of another moddel different from Karima..
Iremeber for Legend, German Edition, there was another model...
maybe this is her...
the screen which contains the menue box contains a language which isnt English...
Otherwise, they really have to fix her looks....
:yik:
george_croft
27-04-07, 06:56
:hea:
NO kidding !!!! Must have taken a lot to write ALL of that for NO reason.. Someone's smart.. I KNOW LEGEND was MADE in 2006.. Does NOT mean it takes place in 2006 smart *$$... And the flashbacks were earlier than TR1 ?? NO waaaay.. She was like 9.. OBVIOUSLY genius... So maybe it IS a little HARD to comprehend. Stop acting like I started playing TR yesterday. I been playing it since it came out year by year and know everything.. Just don't understand why they would make her younger than the original and make it occur BEFORE LEGEND.. But I know this might be a little hard to comprehend... And I KNOW it's the same storyline.. :hea: :hea: :cen:
Dude, calm down, Its pretty obvious that legend is "current time" just like all other tomb raider games except trc:rolleyes:
bloodstormaoa
27-04-07, 09:19
Dude, calm down, Its pretty obvious that legend is "current time" just like all other tomb raider games except trc:rolleyes:
Woah.....I agree.:o
You should really conduct yourself with some.....manners and respect ;)
Aussie500 was just trying to help you understand something. There really is no reason to talk to someone like that on this forum...especially a mod:mis:
Since Legend occurred in 2006 and Tomb Raider 1/Anniversary occurs in 1996 l do not see why there is any trouble understanding when the games take place. The flash back scenes in Legend were earlier than Tomb Raider 1. Lara has more advanced equipment in Legend than in any other previous game, and yet in Anniversary she only has low tech equipment, we are told they tried to make her 10 years younger, she is supposedly in her early twenties (true the numbers do not add up there), and the story is a retelling of the original adventure. Honestly why is it so hard to comprehend that this adventure takes place way before Legend. All they have done is update the graphics and gameplay, changed Lara's age, and gone into more detail on the story, it is still the search for the Atlantean Scion
Couldn't have said better... Honnestly, who didn't knew that ?!
:hea:
NO kidding !!!! Must have taken a lot to write ALL of that for NO reason.. Someone's smart.. I KNOW LEGEND was MADE in 2006.. Does NOT mean it takes place in 2006 smart *$$... And the flashbacks were earlier than TR1 ?? NO waaaay.. She was like 9.. OBVIOUSLY genius... So maybe it IS a little HARD to comprehend. Stop acting like I started playing TR yesterday. I been playing it since it came out year by year and know everything.. Just don't understand why they would make her younger than the original and make it occur BEFORE LEGEND.. But I know this might be a little hard to comprehend... And I KNOW it's the same storyline.. :hea: :hea: :cen:
l suggest you mind your manners there, l should not have to waste my time explaining something that any self respecting Tomb Raider fan who has supposedly played all the games should know. Tomb Raider has always been a present day adventure game, and just in case you are to young to understand that, it occurs round about the time it was made
The changes made in Legend and Anniversary were made for the sake of continuity. Legend is a present day adventure, but if you do not believe me that is your problem. But just to bring home the fact l little more the Ducati Monster S2R Lara rides in Legend was only released in 2005, it could even be the 2006 model
Lara Croft Fan Joe
27-04-07, 12:32
Lara looks great in Anniversary, much more natural. Imo legend lara had too much make up on. Who exactly is she trying to impress in a tomb?
bloodstormaoa
27-04-07, 12:35
Lara looks great in Anniversary, much more natural. Imo legend lara had too much make up on. Who exactly is she trying to impress in a tomb?
A girl has to look good for mummified corpses, wild animals and peruvian demons (FLUFFY!) doesn't she??:p
TRAIDER523
27-04-07, 16:25
l suggest you mind your manners there, l should not have to waste my time explaining something that any self respecting Tomb Raider fan who has supposedly played all the games should know. Tomb Raider has always been a present day adventure game, and just in case you are to young to understand that, it occurs round about the time it was made
The changes made in Legend and Anniversary were made for the sake of continuity. Legend is a present day adventure, but if you do not believe me that is your problem. But just to bring home the fact l little more the Ducati Monster S2R Lara rides in Legend was only released in 2005, it could even be the 2006 model
You DON'T have to "waste" your time explaining (the way you did anyways), you chose to. And I'm NOT too young to understand anything so tounges please be caged. And since LEGEND came out, I have always thought it was set in a time before (even though the other games were present day) because she looks younger and seems like a story she had encountered in the past. And obviously she has every modern day equip. but just didn't make sense to start over the whole franchise.. Heh..... Whateva.. Blah :hea:
Hey Lara's holding up pretty good for 38 if Legend really is set in 2006.
It gives us 30 somethings lots of hope. :D
HA HAAA.. Yah she IS lookin pretty well...And only gets younger looking with time apparently.. :ton:
Woah.....I agree.:o
You should really conduct yourself with some.....manners and respect ;)
Aussie500 was just trying to help you understand something. There really is no reason to talk to someone like that on this forum...especially a mod:mis:
Well AS it was read/ taken.. Sounded real cocky like I just started playing the games yesterday and didn't know the storyline of any game.. :rolleyes:
dream raider
27-04-07, 16:32
You DON'T have to "waste" your time explaining (the way you did anyways), you chose to. And I'm NOT too young to understand anything so tounges please be caged. And since LEGEND came out, I have always thought it was set in a time before (even though the other games were present day) because she looks younger and seems like a story she had encountered in the past. And obviously she has every modern day equip. but just didn't make sense to start over the whole franchise.. Heh..... Whateva.. Blah :hea:
Aussie was explaining to you will understand and Aussie's posts are always meaningful and they are not a waste of time.
Anyway, I like Lara's new look in Anniversary and Legend they do resemble Lara, especially the eyebrows, lips and eyes. In the animation video was the Lara that really striked me, it resemble how Lara would look in reality. You know in the front cover of Anniversary they didn't use that model unfortunately. Maybe they will use the one in the animation movie for Tomb Raider 8.
IMO: AOD Lara looked the best, yes Ani and Leg Lara look more realistic, but that still doesn't mean they're more beautiful.
TRAIDER523, when you post, please make sure you don't make multiple posts in a row, because this is considered as a spam, which is against our Terms & Conditions. If you have something to add, you can Edit the post and make the additions, instead of posting exactly below your previous post. Thank you.
TRAIDER523
27-04-07, 18:19
TRAIDER523, when you post, please make sure you don't make multiple posts in a row, because this is considered as a spam, which is against our Terms & Conditions. If you have something to add, you can Edit the post and make the additions, instead of posting exactly below your previous post. Thank you.
Gotcha thanks.. Well still getting used to multiple quotes that's why, so thank you got bunching it up into one post. :)
TRAIDER523
27-04-07, 18:21
Aussie was explaining to you will understand and Aussie's posts are always meaningful and they are not a waste of time.
Anyway, I like Lara's new look in Anniversary and Legend they do resemble Lara, especially the eyebrows, lips and eyes. In the animation video was the Lara that really striked me, it resemble how Lara would look in reality. You know in the front cover of Anniversary they didn't use that model unfortunately. Maybe they will use the one in the animation movie for Tomb Raider 8.
What do you mean they didn't use that model for the cover ? :confused:
l believe dream raider means the highly realistic model that Plastic Wax did for the advertising campaign and box art was not used in the game itself.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.