www.tombraiderforums.com

Go Back   www.tombraiderforums.com > Tomb Raider Series > Future Tomb Raider Games

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-11-09, 19:51   #211
Moon-Safari
Professor
 
Moon-Safari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac View Post
It would have been possible, but was it worth the time and the money for it?

I mean, it's not like they actually had the time to work on a replay cutscene feature... It's not like it was that hard to reach the actual cutscenes ingame anyway.
yeah ur right about that. The game wasn't too long. It would've been nice to see them all in a row though. If they had more time there would've been a bunch of extra features, I'm sure. But my point is that it would have been possible on the ps3, not if time allowed for it.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer
Moon-Safari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 19:56   #212
jajay119
Historian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinoslayer View Post
i highly doubt that, sony keeps saying the ps3 is the best thing yet but they've yet to prove it contrary to popular belief bluray cannot process graphics and i believe they were having problems with both console because they could have done the same thing for the 360 the way they did it for legend but they didnt so that proves it the ps3 could not handle it letting the cutscenes render in game for replay would add up to a seriously high poly count and the game would be seriously laggy with or without bluray
No one said blu ray processes graphics, it doesn't. Its simply a thinner laser that permits more information to be stored on a disk and enables said information to be output at higher quality, so in effect, in terms of space PS3 could have handled it
__________________
My Loves a revolver, I shoot 'em bang bang, I line 'em up and watch 'em fall
jajay119 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:01   #213
Moon-Safari
Professor
 
Moon-Safari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
Default

^thanks alot for the info jayjay. u sure know ur ****.




To those saying that Tomb Raider wouldn't sell enough if it was PS3 exclusive...

PS3 LEAD the sales of Underworld. So imagine if Underworld was developed FOR the system and used all of its strengths and looked on par with games like uncharted 2. It would have no problem bringing in a return, especially since Eidos wouldn't be wasting money on countless unnecessary ports. OPEN WORLD, TOMB RAIDER, PS3 EXCLUSIVE! that would be enough to sell a game IMHO. It would represent change and a new beginning... and that's exactly what sold Legend.

and if ur against buying a ps3 (for some ridiculously uninformed reason), get a computer. You probably need a new one anyway.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer
Moon-Safari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:04   #214
dinoslayer
Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: helhiem
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jajay119 View Post
No one said blu ray processes graphics, it doesn't. Its simply a thinner laser that permits more information to be stored on a disk and enables said information to be output at higher quality, so in effect, in terms of space PS3 could have handled it
did you read my whole post? i said they could have done the same thing they did for legend in underworld for the 360 and went along and did what ever they wanted with the ps3 but they didnt so that proves the ps3 couldnt handle it rendering that much polies in the game over and over again would make the game really laggy with or WITHOUT bluray

moon-safari: all i hear on this thread is "just check he sales 4 underworld" but what about other CD games? and underworld wasnt the best game out there in terms of gameplay >.> if it was you could argue with sales but it was not.
__________________
In the darkest recesses of every human soul slumbers the shadow of evil.

Last edited by dinoslayer; 03-11-09 at 20:08.
dinoslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:05   #215
shadow_fire
Explorer
 
shadow_fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: "I dont know where my home is, I dont know where my soul is..."
Posts: 564
Default

hmm, I'm thinking the more that I read this thread, the more it kinda makes sense to go exclusive.
Like so many people here have said, its better to perfect working with one console. I'm also thinking if it is exlcusive to one console then sony would proberly be more keen to advertise the game....
Like for this new uncharted game its being advertised left right and center here, yet I cant recall them advertising the last three games....
__________________
I Remember The Day When You Left For Santa Monica...The Day You Told Me Its Over
shadow_fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:10   #216
Rai
Professor
 
Rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 2,760
Default

Quote:
for some ridiculously uninformed reason), get a computer. You probably need a new one anyway
Is not having enough money an informed enough reason for you? I can't afford a new PC either.

You know what exclusive means right? Unchartered is exclusive to the PS3 which means it isn't available on the PC at any rate. If Tomb Raider went the same way then that would mean that PC players would also be excluded not just Xbox players. I don't mean to be rude, but it seems to me that PS3 players or others who are fine with the possibility of a PS3 exclusive are disregarding PC players as well or think that the game would be on the PC so only Xbox players would be left out. The thread title says PS3 exclusive.

So, in my case, even if I could afford a new PC it wouldn't be any good for playing a PS3 exclusive game. I still wouldn't be able to play it. How many fans would TR lose in that case?
__________________
Keep a list of happy thoughts locked in your brain for when life goes sideways

Last edited by Rai; 03-11-09 at 20:14.
Rai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:15   #217
Moon-Safari
Professor
 
Moon-Safari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rai View Post
Is not having enough money an informed enough reason for you? I can't afford a new PC either.
Well then you can't afford a new Tomb Raider game either so move on. You either get the system or you don't. You need money to play games. Nothing personal.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer
Moon-Safari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:20   #218
Rai
Professor
 
Rai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 2,760
Default

^ why should I be excluded from playing a game I have up till now been able to play either on a PS1, or 2 or the PC or on my son's Xbox? I like the game, why should I lose out and a lot of others too. PC and Xbox gamers alike? I can deal with not being able to play new brands such as Unchartered, but why should Tomb Raider, which has been on more than one platform from the word go suddenly be only available on one platform. PS3 games may well sell well, but what about the already existing fanbase who don't have a PS3 for whatever reason. Tomb Raider wouldn't suddenly sell better than now just for being exclusive.

And I buy one game at a time thanks and I often have to save up for them. Not that I play many games, so if a Tomb Raider game comes out on the platform I already own then I will save to get it.
__________________
Keep a list of happy thoughts locked in your brain for when life goes sideways

Last edited by Rai; 03-11-09 at 20:25.
Rai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:23   #219
Lara's home
Professor
 
Lara's home's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moon-Safari View Post

PS3 LEAD the sales of Underworld. So imagine if Underworld was developed FOR the system and used all of its strengths and looked on par with games like uncharted 2. It would have no problem bringing in a return, especially since Eidos wouldn't be wasting money on countless unnecessary ports. OPEN WORLD, TOMB RAIDER, PS3 EXCLUSIVE! that would be enough to sell a game IMHO. It would represent change and a new beginning... and that's exactly what sold Legend.

and if ur against buying a ps3 (for some ridiculously uninformed reason), get a computer. You probably need a new one anyway.
And those sales alone.. Were they strong enough for Tomb raider to go consoel exclusive?
The answer is no.

If anything, I would guess it would go MS exlusive, since they are actually willing to pay for it. What does MS or Eidos care if it sells a bit less on the PS3. Eidos probably makes more money than if it was Multiplayform, since MS pays them and MS pays them because people would move to 360.
__________________
Who dont want Lara Croft to have Big boobs? I AM!!!!

Last edited by Lara's home; 03-11-09 at 20:25.
Lara's home is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-09, 20:25   #220
Moon-Safari
Professor
 
Moon-Safari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rai View Post
^ why should I be excluded from playing a game I have up till now been able to play either on a PS1, or 2 or the PC or on my son's Xbox? I like the game, why should I lose out and a lot of others too. PC and Xbox gamers alike? I can deal with not being able to play new brands such as Unchartered, but why should Tomb Raider, which has been on more than one platform from the word go suddenly be only available on one platform. PS3 games may well sell well, but what about the already existing fanbase who don't have a PS3 for whatever reason.
Tomb Raider needs to be the best game possible. I'm really not interested in bob and steves financial situations. I'm no elitist, but I chose a strong cohesive Tomb Raider franchise over your penny pinching. More and more people are getting PS3's to play games and watch blueray movies. It only does EVERYTHING and it's only $300. Get on board. if not, then bye. Enough interested people have PS3's to make this game sell with or without you. Sadly, you're not that important.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer
Moon-Safari is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.