![]() |
|
|
#211 |
|
Professor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
|
yeah ur right about that. The game wasn't too long. It would've been nice to see them all in a row though. If they had more time there would've been a bunch of extra features, I'm sure. But my point is that it would have been possible on the ps3, not if time allowed for it.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 | |
|
Historian
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
__________________
My Loves a revolver, I shoot 'em bang bang, I line 'em up and watch 'em fall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
|
Professor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
|
^thanks alot for the info jayjay. u sure know ur ****.
![]() To those saying that Tomb Raider wouldn't sell enough if it was PS3 exclusive... PS3 LEAD the sales of Underworld. So imagine if Underworld was developed FOR the system and used all of its strengths and looked on par with games like uncharted 2. It would have no problem bringing in a return, especially since Eidos wouldn't be wasting money on countless unnecessary ports. OPEN WORLD, TOMB RAIDER, PS3 EXCLUSIVE! that would be enough to sell a game IMHO. It would represent change and a new beginning... and that's exactly what sold Legend. and if ur against buying a ps3 (for some ridiculously uninformed reason), get a computer. You probably need a new one anyway.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 | |
|
Student
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: helhiem
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
moon-safari: all i hear on this thread is "just check he sales 4 underworld" but what about other CD games? and underworld wasnt the best game out there in terms of gameplay >.> if it was you could argue with sales but it was not.
__________________
In the darkest recesses of every human soul slumbers the shadow of evil. Last edited by dinoslayer; 03-11-09 at 20:08. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: "I dont know where my home is, I dont know where my soul is..."
Posts: 564
|
hmm, I'm thinking the more that I read this thread, the more it kinda makes sense to go exclusive.
Like so many people here have said, its better to perfect working with one console. I'm also thinking if it is exlcusive to one console then sony would proberly be more keen to advertise the game.... Like for this new uncharted game its being advertised left right and center here, yet I cant recall them advertising the last three games....
__________________
I Remember The Day When You Left For Santa Monica...The Day You Told Me Its Over |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 | |
|
Professor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 2,760
|
Quote:
You know what exclusive means right? Unchartered is exclusive to the PS3 which means it isn't available on the PC at any rate. If Tomb Raider went the same way then that would mean that PC players would also be excluded not just Xbox players. I don't mean to be rude, but it seems to me that PS3 players or others who are fine with the possibility of a PS3 exclusive are disregarding PC players as well or think that the game would be on the PC so only Xbox players would be left out. The thread title says PS3 exclusive. So, in my case, even if I could afford a new PC it wouldn't be any good for playing a PS3 exclusive game. I still wouldn't be able to play it. How many fans would TR lose in that case?
__________________
Keep a list of happy thoughts locked in your brain for when life goes sideways Last edited by Rai; 03-11-09 at 20:14. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Professor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
|
Well then you can't afford a new Tomb Raider game either so move on. You either get the system or you don't. You need money to play games. Nothing personal.
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer |
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Professor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Christchurch
Posts: 2,760
|
^ why should I be excluded from playing a game I have up till now been able to play either on a PS1, or 2 or the PC or on my son's Xbox? I like the game, why should I lose out and a lot of others too. PC and Xbox gamers alike? I can deal with not being able to play new brands such as Unchartered, but why should Tomb Raider, which has been on more than one platform from the word go suddenly be only available on one platform. PS3 games may well sell well, but what about the already existing fanbase who don't have a PS3 for whatever reason. Tomb Raider wouldn't suddenly sell better than now just for being exclusive.
And I buy one game at a time thanks and I often have to save up for them. Not that I play many games, so if a Tomb Raider game comes out on the platform I already own then I will save to get it.
__________________
Keep a list of happy thoughts locked in your brain for when life goes sideways Last edited by Rai; 03-11-09 at 20:25. |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 | |
|
Professor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,667
|
Quote:
The answer is no. If anything, I would guess it would go MS exlusive, since they are actually willing to pay for it. What does MS or Eidos care if it sells a bit less on the PS3. Eidos probably makes more money than if it was Multiplayform, since MS pays them and MS pays them because people would move to 360.
__________________
Who dont want Lara Croft to have Big boobs? I AM!!!! Last edited by Lara's home; 03-11-09 at 20:25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#220 | |
|
Professor
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,610
|
Quote:
__________________
The Way of Discovery: Theater to the Pioneer |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|