23-07-17, 16:48 | #21 |
Inactive
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 333
|
...They are still talking about grenades, right? Another ''dirty'' dialogue from Rutland's part comes, when he says ''Too bad Lara you are so unfriendly. You, me and Amanda would make a great threesome'' ()
|
23-07-17, 17:42 | #22 | ||
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,507
|
Quote:
Quote:
You're right! Didn't really think about that. Maybe these quotes are ambiguous on purpose. |
||
23-07-17, 19:03 | #23 |
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19,214
|
Rutland is officially TR's biggest perv next to Larson (and possibly Pierre if you include his TR1 perv jacket).
|
23-07-17, 19:11 | #24 | |
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 4,360
|
Quote:
EDIT- Whoops, I'm a bit late in the convo concerning Rutland being a suggestive creep. I'm weary of anyone who shows that much man-cleavage in general though Last edited by HarleyCroft; 23-07-17 at 19:18. |
|
23-07-17, 20:00 | #25 |
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19,214
|
|
23-07-17, 20:22 | #26 |
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 4,360
|
|
23-07-17, 20:46 | #27 |
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,507
|
What do you expect from a chap who wears a red silk shirt and sunglasses while raiding tombs? He's always prepared for meeting big busted British bimbos, erm, tomb raiders.
Actually, when I think about it, Rutland is one of the things in Legend I can't really complain about and I think that he was heavily underused. Such a shame that he dies in a cutscene and couldn't make a return in Underworld. What was up with Crystal's obsession with female antagonists back then that they had to kill him after appearing in just one game? So that they can give Amanda a reason to be actually mad at Lara so that Lara doesn't look as selfish and evil in Underworld as she does in Legend? |
23-07-17, 20:49 | #28 |
Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 13,255
|
I've heard that Rutland's father was supposed to be a co-villain in Underworld seeking revenge for his son from Lara , shame , there were many possibilities with which Underworld's story could've been much better , but NO ! the story would've become too complicated
|
23-07-17, 21:47 | #29 |
Member
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 228
|
The only thing I found really nonsensical was the ending!
How did Amanda 'kill' Amelia in the first place? In my brain I would have thought that Lara and Amanda would have had to grow up with Lara's mother still alive and then reach the point in Bolivia where they play around with past events and rewrite the timeline only then to 'kill' Amelia. So am I playing through a rewritten timeline? If so then how did the events of Legend play out exactly the same in the original timeline where Lara is looking for the dais because she wanted to find Amelia if in the original timeline Amelia wouldn't have disappeared? So Lara wouldn't have had that obsessive motivation to track down the dais in Bolivia and so things wouldn't have exactly played out the same way for her to reach the Bolivia Redux level! Why did previous timeline Lara even become an archaeologist if her reasons for becoming one was to find her mother if her mother would have already been alive then? And...and...argghhhh!!! My head!!! Am I thinking about this the wrong way? |
23-07-17, 21:54 | #30 | ||
Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,507
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | |
|
|