Tomb Raider Forums  

Go Back   Tomb Raider Forums > General Forums > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28-05-09, 12:53   #1
la-la-lara
Member
 
la-la-lara's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 928
Default Chemistry Question

By which quantum numbers is a hydrogen-like atomic orbital identified? By all three of the following or just n and ?

Principal quantum number n
Angular momentum quantum number
Magnetic quantum number m

Any help would be highly appreciated.

la-la-lara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-09, 15:13   #2
tampi
Member
 
tampi's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,784
Default

[IMG]http://i39.************/15yvuyt.gif[/IMG]
tampi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-09, 15:28   #3
Phys
Member
 
Phys's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,662
Default

Phys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-09, 15:35   #4
Cochrane
Golden
 
Cochrane's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 16,751
Default

All three, according to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_...uantum_numbers

It's a long time since I last had chemistry and I wasn't too good at it then (and I didn't do it in english), but this sounds about right.
Cochrane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-09, 15:35   #5
Catapharact
Member
 
Catapharact's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 23,157
Default

The Principal number is 1 since hydrogen atom is at a ground state level.

Since the hydogen atom is at a ground state and has only a 1s orbital then the magnetic number of the atom l is zero.

Spin number is also zero since there are no electrons.
Catapharact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-09, 15:37   #6
thanatos
Member
 
thanatos's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by la-la-lara View Post
By which quantum numbers is a hydrogen-like atomic orbital identified? By all three of the following or just n and ?

Principal quantum number n
Angular momentum quantum number
Magnetic quantum number m

Any help would be highly appreciated.

Orbitals are given names in the form:

where X is the energy level corresponding to the principal quantum number n, type is a lower-case letter denoting the shape or subshell of the orbital and it corresponds to the angular quantum number l, and y is the number of electrons in that orbital.
For example, the orbital 1s2 (pronounced "one ess two") has two electrons and is the lowest energy level (n = 1) and has an angular quantum number of l = 0. In X-ray notation, the principal quantum number is given a letter associated with it. For n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ....., the letters associated with those numbers are K, L, M, N, O .... respectively.
Physicists and chemists use a standard notation to describe the electron configurations of atoms and molecules. For atoms, the notation consists of a string of atomic orbital labels (eg, 1s, 2p, 3d, 4f) with the number of electrons assigned to each orbital (or set of orbitals sharing the same label) placed as a superscript. For example, hydrogen has one electron in the s-orbital of the first shell, so its configuration is written 1s1. Lithium has two electrons in the 1s-subshell and one in the (higher-energy) 2s-subshell, so its configuration is written 1s2 2s1 (pronounced "one-s-two, two-s-one"). Phosphorus (atomic number 15), is as follows: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p3.
For atoms with many electrons, this notation can become lengthy and so an abbreviated notation is used, noting that the first few subshells are identical to those of one or another of the noble gases. Phosphorus, for instance, differs from neon (1s2 2s2 2p6) only by the presence of a third shell. Thus, the electron configuration of neon is pulled out, and phosphorus is written as follows: [Ne] 3s2 3p3. This convention is useful as it is the electrons in the outermost shell which most determine the chemistry of the element.
The order of writing the orbitals is not completely fixed: some sources group all orbitals with the same value of n together, while other sources (as here) follow the order given by Madelung's rule. Hence the electron configuration of iron can be written as [Ar] 3d6 4s2 (keeping the 3d-electrons with the 3s- and 3p-electrons which are implied by the configuration of argon) or as [Ar] 4s2 3d6 (following the Aufbau principle, see below).
The superscript 1 for a singly-occupied orbital is not compulsory.[4] It is quite common to see the letters of the orbital labels (s, p, d, f) written in an italic or slanting typeface, although the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) recommends a normal typeface (as used here). The choice of letters originates from a now-obsolete system of categorizing spectral lines as "sharp", "principal", "diffuse" and "fine", based on their observed fine structure: their modern usage indicates orbitals with an azimuthal quantum number, l, of 0, 1, 2 or 3 respectively. After "f", the sequence continues alphabetically "g", "h", "i"… (l = 4, 5, 6…), although orbitals of these types are rarely required.
The electron configurations of molecules are written in a similar way, except that molecular orbital labels are used instead of atomic orbital labels
Now that you've read all that nonsense, go off and try to work out your own homework rather than have people on a forum tell you the answer.
thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-05-09, 06:37   #7
la-la-lara
Member
 
la-la-lara's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thanatos View Post
Now that you've read all that nonsense, go off and try to work out your own homework rather than have people on a forum tell you the answer.
You did not answer to what I asked.

In this schoolyear's chemistry we were taught that all three quantum numbers identify a hydrogen-like atomic orbital. There is no doubt about it. Not until the opening post was actually a multiple-choice question in the Panhellenic Entrance Examination this year. Many experienced chemists stated that only two of the quantum numbers are necessary to identify a hydrogen-like atomic orbital. That's what all this fuss is about.

As you can see, all I wanted was a third opinion.
la-la-lara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-05-09, 06:43   #8
spikejones
Member
 
spikejones's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,028
Default

10 years since I'v studied this stuff. Obviously none of it stuck
spikejones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-05-09, 06:52   #9
MattTR
Member
 
MattTR's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 18,308
Default

NEVER took chemistry in my life.. but wishing you some good luck.
MattTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 16:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Tomb Raider Forums is not owned or operated by CDE Entertainment Ltd.
Lara Croft and Tomb Raider are trademarks of CDE Entertainment Ltd.