^I thought the level design was kind of...non-existent in some parts, or so simple and to the point.

Of course there were cool nooks, and the design of the events was incredibly well done.

But I guess I just expect...more interior exploration.

That we've played.

Y'all don't know what went down that night in Brighton.

Anyways, I assume Lara's just going to become more enjoyable for those who can't stand to see her wimper.

CD seem to want to portray her as a brutal action hero, or something like that.

However that in itself isn't equal to classic Lara bad assery, simply because she's brutal and capable. There's more skill and charm to it than that. But whatevsiez.

Oh you mean moving in straight lines were you can mash buttons and don't have to do any exploration....



To make her human they have given her no distinct identity. She is a cookie cutter human being. I don't really care about her

Wut! When did you back? :D

Brighton is a ****hole, and no one wants to know how Lara earns her money as a crack whore.

So what exactly did you do in the Mountain Village, Shanty Town, and Shipwreck beach?

Well, if they've brought new fans to series, which they have, they must have done something to give her some sort of distinct identity.
Or maybe there was good level design. Something was good about this game, it has done well.

I utterly confused, to be honest.

I can't decide if CD should follow the path of action aesthetics, character exploration and stereotyped Hollywood glamour or the aspect of concentrating on open world exploration, platforming , puzzle solving and freedom.

I actually want them to focus on both aspects but we just had too much character exploration in the reboot. I want more freedom.

The next game.

Well, the next game has to be more about gameplay and levels and not about Lara.

:vlol:

Now that just "fixed" the thread!

Dear lawd, this is such a digusting gif.

No.

Just awful.

:vlol: :vlol:

/dead