| Shark_Blade |
14-02-13 16:14 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac
(Post 6650053)
There is no truth, just opinions. I think we get it, you don't like the game. No need to force this perspective into other's throats. Nobody will force you to play the game, so move on or be constructive?...
Even reviews tend to be biased or subjective anyway. They seem to follow a trend most of the time. I remember by the time AoD was released, every reviews got into the "WHO BASH THE MOST THIS GAME" thing and a big majority of reviews were nitpicking every elements from the game, overlooking its good side. I've yet to read a good neutral unbiased review.
|
I believe you were being misled. The only truth I'm implying is that there are differing opinions. Never did I claim I am the infinite truest of the truth.
And since when did I not like the game? Shame on you. :ohn:
Yes reviews sometimes do follow trend. But what I always do is read both sides - from professional reviewers point of view and normal gamers. Metacritic is a best example for this.
It would be nice get any sort of review right now to get a picture how the game is coming along, since launch date is indeed very near.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weemanply109
(Post 6650054)
Ironic, he talks about accepting differing opinions, but he calls his "truth" as if it has more merit than ours. :vlol: Everyone's right, he's like a broken record, we're all entitled to our opinions, but repeating them constantly to up your post count is a big YAWN to the rest of us, we no longer care at this point, sadly. You can keep posting it if you like, we can't change that and I'm not going to tell you to not to, but just know that people are allowed to have an opinion of your opinion too, and we think it's tiring. This applies to all the haters that are still sticking around here (especially that idiot who posts one word per line/sentence and used to post spoilers in thread titles :rolleyes:)
(Btw, I mean no disrespect to Shark_Blade, just sharing my thoughts)
Reviews usually arrive in the final week before the games release. It's ALWAYS been that way. Maybe magazines get theirs in earlier because they release theirs in monthly increments and don't have the ability to post it last minute before the game's release like a gaming blog site and such does.
|
See response above.
Now enough about me, talk about the game.
Since game mags got early digs like a month early, hence it applies to websites too. It would be impossible to schedule each reviews for hundreds and thousands of games just before their actual release dates. It would be ready at the point of writing asap to chase publishment/production. The only thing holding them up now is an embargo, like I stated my suspicion. |
