Tomb Raider Forums
Page 2217 of 3825 « First 1217171721172167220722152216 2217 2218221922272267231727173217 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Tomb Raider Forums (https://www.tombraiderforums.com/index.php)
-   Tomb Raider (Crystal Dynamics' version) (https://www.tombraiderforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   TOMB RAIDER General Discussion Thread (https://www.tombraiderforums.com/showthread.php?t=187894)

starstruck 05-12-12 07:45
Quote:
Originally Posted by TippingWater (Post 6550459)
People are really negative towards this game :o. Oh my.. Can't say I disagree...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha oh man. You made me click on the comments sections of a bunch of these sites and it's all brutal.

Whatever. Every popstar I like gets dragged by the general public, so it's nothing new. :p

Maybe it's because Lara Croft is a woman. ;)

Shark_Blade 05-12-12 07:46
Quote:
Originally Posted by TippingWater (Post 6550459)
People are really negative towards this game :o. Oh my.. Can't say I disagree...





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admit I agree with those comments..

I'm mindly cautious about this reboot, and I'm not rushing to buy the Collector's Edition, Survival whatsoever until I'm definitely sure what they're delivering to us.

TippingWater 05-12-12 07:46
Quote:
Originally Posted by just*raidin*tomb (Post 6550465)
You've really appealed to those mainstream gamers haven't you, Crystal? :tmb:
Tomb Raider was never supposed to be mainstream, sure it appealed man people in the past, because the game was unique, but it managed to stay true to its core. Oh well..

Quote:
Originally Posted by just*raidin*tomb (Post 6550470)
With everything I read or watch, I can see this possibly turning into an unsuccessful and pointless reboot.
Yup! http://www.gamekings.tv/videos/inter...r-tomb-raider/

BTW: The game will be fully complete in about two weeks from now.

TippingWater 05-12-12 07:49
Quote:
Originally Posted by starstruck (Post 6550472)
Haha oh man. You made me click on the comments sections of a bunch of these sites and it's all brutal.

Whatever. Every popstar I like gets dragged by the general public, so it's nothing new. :p

Maybe it's because Lara Croft is a woman. ;)
Nope. It's not that. Most people really wanted this game to succeed, but Crystal so far failed to impress.. The game could still be amazing and all, but as just* wrote, I feel this reboot could turn out to be pointless. Maybe it's time for another company to take over our beloved franchise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark_Blade (Post 6550473)
Gotta admit I agree with those comments..

I'm mindly cautious about this reboot, and I'm not rushing to buy the Collector's Edition, Survival whatsoever until I'm definitely sure what they're delivering to us.
:tmb: After Underworld, I will forever be cautious when it comes to games, especially Tomb Raider.

lcroft_lc 05-12-12 07:49
89 days. :jmp:

TippingWater 05-12-12 07:50
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcroft_lc (Post 6550478)
89 days. :jmp:
Let's hope that all this wait will pay off.. in the end.

just*raidin*tomb 05-12-12 07:52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevo505 (Post 6550471)
Would you rather they kept up the dying Legend/Underworld style, or just have let the series die out? I'm grateful they're at least trying to let Tomb Raider shine again.
I would prefer it if they didn't go in the direction they went in. I understand the reboot, but I much prefer the original concepts.

There's such a ridiculous emphasis on Lara to the point where the developers make the game easier just so that its "emotional". The developers say that they have made certain parts impossible to fall to your death just because it would interrupt the story. It's all about the narrative and Lara and its so disheartening. Especially when Lara herself isn't even likable. From what we've seen I see absolutely no sense of personality or character. Only a scared panting grunting girl who's having a ****ing terrible day because its "emotional".

TippingWater 05-12-12 07:56
Quote:
Originally Posted by just*raidin*tomb (Post 6550481)
I would prefer it if they didn't go in the direction they went in. I understand reboot, but I much prefer the original concepts.

There's such a ridiculous emphasis on Lara to the point where the developers make the game easier just so that its "emotional". The developers say that they have made certain parts impossible to fall to your death just because it would interrupt the story. It's all about the narrative and Lara and its so disheartening. Especially when Lara herself isn't even likable. From what we've seen I so absolutely no sense of personality or character. Only a scared panting grunting girl who just who's having a ****ing terrible day because its "emotional".
Exactly!:tmb: A prime example of that impossible to die situations takes place at the beginning of the game, on the rolling log. **** emotional ****! Who cares about that? Underworld flopped because it was a bad game, not because Lara was "Teflon" like *rolleyes*. I was really open minded towards this reboot, but a new bio was completely unnecessary. If they didn't screw things over with Underworld, which led them to a dead end, I bet this reboot wouldn't have been necessary in the 1st place.

starstruck 05-12-12 08:06
Quote:
Originally Posted by TippingWater (Post 6550477)
Nope. It's not that. Most people really wanted this game to succeed, but Crystal so far failed to impress.. The game could still be amazing and all, but as just* wrote, I feel this reboot could turn out to be pointless. Maybe it's time for another company to take over our beloved franchise.
I don't believe most people want Tomb Raider to succeed.

I also thought the reboot was completely pointless months ago, but now I've joined the madness and it doesn't bother me at all anymore. *shrug*

Lara being transformed from a badass chick to a random chick is kind of annoying though, but obviously we're supposed to see her grow into the Lara we know and love, so it's too early to harp on that. :)

just*raidin*tomb 05-12-12 08:07
Quote:
Originally Posted by TippingWater (Post 6550484)
Exactly!:tmb: A prime example of that impossible to die situations takes place at the beginning of the game, on the rolling log. **** emotional ****! Who cares about that? Underworld flopped because it was a bad game, not because Lara was "Teflon" like *rolleyes*. I was really open minded towards this reboot, but a new bio was completely unnecessary. If they didn't screw things over with Underworld, which led them to a dead end, I bet this reboot wouldn't have been necessary in the 1st place.
The thing is, it seems they're using Lara as the selling point of this game. And that's so wrong. No one cares. :(

I don't know. I hope the game manages to really surprise me, but if not I'll pick up Far Cry 3. It's virtually the same elements and looks a ton better imo.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04.
Page 2217 of 3825 « First 1217171721172167220722152216 2217 2218221922272267231727173217 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Tomb Raider Forums is not owned or operated by CDE Entertainment Ltd.
Lara Croft and Tomb Raider are trademarks of CDE Entertainment Ltd.