www.tombraiderforums.com

Go Back   www.tombraiderforums.com > Community Forums > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19-05-19, 19:41   #501
Caesum
Tomb Raider
 
Caesum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Poland, Warsaw Gender: Male
Posts: 11,469
Default

If that's tlr_online's party then I just hope Admles' questionable "opinions" are not representative of administration's views.
Caesum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-19, 21:38   #502
Dennis's Mom
Moderator
 
Dennis's Mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 14,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woops View Post
But he says the forum's terms and conditions don't give you a right to free speech. Is he violating forum rules??
Did he insult someone? Did he circumvent the censor? Did he encourage piracy? Use a double account?

The forum's got a lot of rules, but disabusing the membership of the idea that TRF is subject to the concept of "civil rights" the same way democracies are isn't one of them.
__________________
At this point, if you haven't put that person on your ignore list, you just like fighting.
Dennis's Mom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-19, 22:26   #503
Woops
Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 923
Default

It's not civil rights. It's basic principles. Everyone should be allowed to free speech (without being a ****, that is). Admles said otherwise. I asked where in the rules that is and nobody answered. Gabi said he was just using his right to "free speech". Which Admles said we don't have a right to???????

You're also completely dismissing the fact that his post is shading someone in the first place which I'll repeat for the third time now if anyone else did the same it'd be considered toxic spam
Woops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-19, 22:30   #504
SrDanielPonces
Relic Hunter
 
SrDanielPonces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Portugal
Posts: 8,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woops View Post
It's not civil rights. It's basic principles. Everyone should be allowed to free speech (without being a ****, that is). Admles said otherwise. I asked where in the rules that is and nobody answered. Gabi said he was just using his right to "free speech". Which Admles said we don't have a right to???????

You're also completely dismissing the fact that his post is shading someone in the first place which I'll repeat for the third time now if anyone else did the same it'd be considered toxic spam
Sorry, but gotta agree here. I thought that post was quite unecessary and honestly rude to all of the 59,528 members here.
SrDanielPonces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-19, 23:58   #505
jackali
Super Moderator
 
jackali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 14,776
Default

I don't want to speak for Gabi (or anyone else for that matter) but I took it that she was being tongue in cheek with that. Perhaps that might not have come across for everyone?

As far as what Dave said, that response to bans does actually come up more often than you'd think. Is it really that toxic? Can you shed some light on how it's toxic? The response to moderation is rarely positive. Keeping one's distance isn't received all that well, and posting as regular members in addition to posting as mods gets people's hackles up. I'd argue that one kind of jokey post from a mod is less toxic than a few people ganging up on said mod and being pretty rude and toxic themselves. Seems like all the pots are calling the kettle black.
__________________
Life tastes better with cake. 🎂
jackali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-19, 00:17   #506
Dustie
Relic Hunter
 
Dustie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 9,212
Default

Members have been having issues with moderation not since yesterday and Admles' posts add fuel to the fire.

So yeah I hope they are not representative of the administration as a whole.

Or maybe he should run his posts through you guys before he presses the Submit Reply button.
Dustie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-19, 00:20   #507
Woops
Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackali View Post
I don't want to speak for Gabi (or anyone else for that matter) but I took it that she was being tongue in cheek with that. Perhaps that might not have come across for everyone?
No. No it didn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackali View Post
As far as what Dave said, that response to bans does actually come up more often than you'd think. Is it really that toxic? Can you shed some light on how it's toxic? The response to moderation is rarely positive. Keeping one's distance isn't received all that well, and posting as regular members in addition to posting as mods gets people's hackles up. I'd argue that one kind of jokey post from a mod is less toxic than a few people ganging up on said mod and being pretty rude and toxic themselves. Seems like all the pots are calling the kettle black.
Okay I suppose he wasn't shading a particular person, he was shading a bunch of people. Awesome
How is that not toxic

"Response to moderation is rarely positive" sorry but what do you expect if a mod came to a thread like this mocking what apparently is a pretty popular response to being banned

I don't see how anyone's ganged up on anyone but alright.


And that's not really his first post of this nature and you probably already know that. But thanks for the typical response, everyone just seems to be twisting this out of topic to try and spin the fault on members instead. I'll just bite the bullet and say I agree if you want.
Woops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-19, 01:16   #508
ActuallyArlow
Explorer
 
ActuallyArlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 915
Default

Lol @Mods backpedalling like crazy now. I love it when any kind of 'higher ups' recieve backlash from the crowd. If this came off as shady I can just say it was 'tongue in cheek'.
__________________
Cetrion: "A collector of virtues, perhaps"
ActuallyArlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-19, 08:33   #509
Caesum
Tomb Raider
 
Caesum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Poland, Warsaw Gender: Male
Posts: 11,469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustie View Post
Or maybe he should run his posts through you guys before he presses the Submit Reply button.
This is so true. Checked Admles' latest posts and signature and I just can't believe how "you have no rights" mentality they are filled with. As a moderator he should rather make it clear that yes you have your freedom of speech for as long as it's respectful towards other users. I honestly hope this is just some light trolling and not actually a representation of this individual views (or even worse, whole administration's views). That would be incredibly worrying.

Then again it speaks miles when even regular users find moderator's posts controversial enough to suggest him being moderated by someone else.
Caesum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-19, 08:44   #510
jackali
Super Moderator
 
jackali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 14,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustie View Post
Members have been having issues with moderation not since yesterday and Admles' posts add fuel to the fire.

So yeah I hope they are not representative of the administration as a whole.

Or maybe he should run his posts through you guys before he presses the Submit Reply button.
No one person (save Justin himself) can be an absolute authority here, and when moderators do truly step out of line, action is taken.

I don't think this post was out of line. Now, Justin can overrule me on that if he wants, but I don't think it was that bad.

When it comes to members having issues with moderation, the best way is to take it up with the team. There are definitely times when we don't always make the best decisions in the world - we are just people. We do try our best to maintain enough objectivity when we handle instances of rulebreaking. This doesn't always happen, and members are welcome to dispute something that could be unjust moderation. More often than not, moderation actions are taken because they very clearly break the rules, and in that case claims of unfairness will be promptly dismissed. When there's a grey area, if it's brought to the attention of the wider team, we'll make a decision together.

Now, if you're bringing up past issues you have, does that mean it's right for everyone else to do the same for you? Or for any other member here? I'm not sure that fighting alleged fire with fire is the way to go here, but that's just me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woops View Post
No. No it didn't.



Okay I suppose he wasn't shading a particular person, he was shading a bunch of people. Awesome
How is that not toxic

"Response to moderation is rarely positive" sorry but what do you expect if a mod came to a thread like this mocking what apparently is a pretty popular response to being banned

I don't see how anyone's ganged up on anyone but alright.


And that's not really his first post of this nature and you probably already know that. But thanks for the typical response, everyone just seems to be twisting this out of topic to try and spin the fault on members instead. I'll just bite the bullet and say I agree if you want.
If you want to look at the nature of this thread, you might notice that it could be taken in a way that everyone who has posted in here has shaded someone by making a post about something someone else has said. The idea of this thread was not to do that, and it's a bit of a joke thread. If you really think that one person's comment is so much worse than everyone else's, I think that says a lot more about you than it does anyone else. But that's just the way I see it Now, if you can agree that everything here could be taken in a bad way, should we close the thread? If it's really just a bunch of people shading others? Or perhaps is there a chance that this thread isn't meant to be taken wholly seriously?

As far as ganging up on people, at least 5 different members, none of whom were targeted, have come into this thread and made some pretty rude comments about one other member (moderator or otherwise). Is that not ganging up?

No, I don't want you to agree with what I say because I say it. I'm not taking any moderation actions here because I don't think it's escalated to a point where I need to take action. A discussion is being had and that's healthy. We're not at a point where discussions have broken down, as they tend to do when people start responding to a ban by talking about free speech on a private forum with open membership - people often do so with indignation and a rational discussion whereby we can better evaluate the situation can't easily happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ActuallyArlow View Post
Lol @Mods backpedalling like crazy now. I love it when any kind of 'higher ups' recieve backlash from the crowd. If this came off as shady I can just say it was 'tongue in cheek'.
Well that's a load of nonsense there. As I've said, that's how it came across to me, but then I've also said that I don't want to speak for anyone else and they're welcome to correct me and tell me otherwise. No backpedaling here. And no, you can't do that. If you make a post that gets brought up with moderation, and legitimately turns out to be a joke, then any action taken against you, after being informed of that and a discussion taking place about it, could well be reversed. That does not mean that you or any member can use that as an excuse when it's not the case, and if it starts becoming a go-to excuse then we'll have to stop letting anything slide.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caesum View Post
This is so true. Checked Admles' latest posts and signature and I just can't believe how "you have no rights" mentality they are filled with. As a moderator he should rather make it clear that yes you have your freedom of speech for as long as it's respectful towards other users. I honestly hope this is just some light trolling and not actually a representation of this individual views (or even worse, whole administration's views). That would be incredibly worrying.

Then again it speaks miles when even regular users find moderator's posts controversial enough to suggest him being moderated by someone else.
If you think a post breaks the rules, it's not your responsibility to publicly call out the poster, rather you should make use of the report system. My intervention in this thread has only come about because several members such as yours think it's a good idea to gang up on someone you don't like. If you think a post a member makes breaks the rules, report it. Same as with moderators.

Now, a discussion can definitely be had, but it's not appropriate to go about it in the way that several members have. Use the report system when you think you see a post breaking the rules.
__________________
Life tastes better with cake. 🎂
jackali is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 16:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.