13-09-19, 07:32 | #131 | ||
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,827
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm so ready to see how things are going to look next gen though |
||
13-09-19, 10:33 | #132 | |
Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 3,448
|
Quote:
Just not PS1-to-PS2 level of better. I think the plan for next generation is to make things easier with no loss in graphical fidelity (e.g. going for real time processing instead of baked/prerendered effects) while being able to deliver on the gameplay and framerate, rather than just make the games look "better" (whatever that means). |
|
13-09-19, 21:19 | #133 |
Inactive
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 4,776
|
|
14-09-19, 06:54 | #134 | |
Member
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
Last edited by Alterjano; 14-09-19 at 06:55. |
|
14-09-19, 13:21 | #135 |
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,901
|
But were people really expecting a old-gen version of SotTR? RotTR still came during the transition period (late transition if we are honest) and only because of the exclusivity deal. Feasible or not, a last-gen version of SotTR would be a very bad decision, especially for consoles which stopped being produced two (XB360) or one year (PS3) before the games release.
Now, a Switch version would have been swell, but still, considering the engine probably doesn't natively support the console, and that it would definitely need a lot of proper optimization (especially Paititi), I also can see why we didn't get it in there either. But hey, if Dragon Quest XI S is a success, maybe that will make SE port more current games to the switch, and we can have proper portable Tomb Raider games. |
14-09-19, 21:57 | #136 |
Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 602
|
anything above 85 on metracritic is consider good game thats what they said in my pc gamer mag
|
18-09-19, 18:33 | #137 |
Member
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 287
|
It feels like PS4 and XB1 came out no later than three years ago. How has it already been 5 years??
|
23-09-19, 07:25 | #138 |
Golden
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 26,508
|
I feel one of the reasons it's the lowest rated is because simply following the main game without doing any of the optional tombs makes the game feel incomplete. I imagine some reviewers just breezed through it and didn't take part in the best parts of the game, the tombs. This is why I feel those tombs should have been incorporated as part of the main game and not optional.
SOTTR is my fav in the trilogy for sure, but if someone is skipping optional tombs altogether, the first two in the trilogy would feel more complete. |
24-09-19, 00:41 | #139 |
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,150
|
It's really weird, the trilogy feels like the same game and so different at the same time, I think it's that Lara differs in each game but the gameplay feels alike
|
24-09-19, 21:19 | #140 |
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 18,391
|
Because they released a half-baked 2013 game in 2018.
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|