4K gameplay with the Trilogy (PS3) version

[Deathly Karma]

OMFG! These DLC's were the only reason I wanted an Xbox, great job GFY2013 on the videos. Could you tell me where I put (--protect_zero=false), because I'm looking on Github and I can't seem to find anything about how to add it.

[GFY2013]

Originally Posted by Deathly Karma

OMFG! These DLC's were the only reason I wanted an Xbox, great job GFY2013 on the videos. Could you tell me where I put (--protect_zero=false), because I'm looking on Github and I can't seem to find anything about how to add it.

Thank you!

Create a shortcut, properties, and next to target add that! Or you can change it in the config file as well, so you don't have to run it through the shortcut. Also be sure to use Canary build. (Honestly I didn't try the other one but I did these with the Canary build Jan 29.)

[New Dwight]

Originally Posted by GFY2013

Not at all. I'm on Ryzen.

I can say more about RPCS3 though: it has a TSX instructions setting that is only available on Intel CPUs, but don't know if it affects performance at all. Also at least 8 threads are required to run some light games even, if you want more heavy games then 12 threads are the minimum. (You can try running them etc, but performance will be heavily limited)
I'm on 12 threads myself, I haven't had any problems, performance is great. My poor 1600X has seen some stuff in his 3 yrs.

who knew those console system were that complex.

[Wooxman]

Originally Posted by GFY2013

Depends on the game really. Fortunately all 3 trilogy games are not dependent on the clocks scale, meaning only changing the frequency value is enough to "unlock" fps. On other games the game speeds up, then you have to decrease the clock to slow it down, that's when physics start to break, if I understand correctly. These games' clock always stay at their initial, 100% value. (Unless you want to try it slowed down, or run it faster.)

That's interesting. The PC versions of the LAU trilogy only work well up to 85 FPS (probably because 85 Hz was pretty common in CRT monitors). If you go over that then the phyics don't work right and for example in TRU the little blocks that you have to put onto pressure plates will fly around once you drop them which makes the game unbeatable.

[GFY2013]

Originally Posted by New Dwight

who knew those console system were that complex.

Unfortunately I don't know any technical details. I'm sure the system is complex of course, but the PS3's specs is not beefy at all. Emulating all hardware components/layers is what's really difficult.

Originally Posted by Wooxman

That's interesting. The PC versions of the LAU trilogy only work well up to 85 FPS (probably because 85 Hz was pretty common in CRT monitors). If you go over that then the phyics don't work right and for example in TRU the little blocks that you have to put onto pressure plates will fly around once you drop them which makes the game unbeatable.

Really? I haven't even seen that. I will check it out in the emulator, and report back if it's there. I haven't seen anything weird yet though.

Some TRA comparisons:

big
Both were at 2x resolution scale. (2560x1440 rendered image, presented at 1080p) RPCS3 was way smoother.

RPCS3 left, Xenia right

[JimbobJeffers]

This is gorgeous, ugh it just makes me want to continue my HD project Thanks for posting all your screenshots and details!