30-12-10, 10:44 | #21 | |
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,996
|
^Actually, the Youtube properties in that comparison are out of date (as I said before), they're now:
Quote:
|
|
30-12-10, 10:48 | #22 |
Inactive
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 12,233
|
|
30-12-10, 10:52 | #23 | |
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,996
|
Quote:
|
|
30-12-10, 10:56 | #24 |
Inactive
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 12,233
|
But don't you agree that it's worth getting a vimeo account? I mean, youtube is so gltichy(imo), they randomly take your sound of saying it's copyright infringement, it ruins quality for most people, it takes longer to upload, etc. Maybe it's just me being a vimeo fan boy but why would you be lazy and stay for that?
|
30-12-10, 10:58 | #25 |
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 243
|
I also think vimeo is better
|
30-12-10, 11:06 | #26 |
Inactive
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 12,233
|
We should have a poll.
|
30-12-10, 11:32 | #27 |
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,462
|
Mh.. didn't you see the comparison? YouTube uploading is obviously much better. 2GB per video. Whereas Vimeo allows only a quarter of that per week.
|
30-12-10, 12:12 | #28 |
Inactive
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 12,233
|
Well, youtube has a time limit so it can afford all that. How many tutorials do you think one person plan on uploading in a week? That's more than enough I think.
|
30-12-10, 12:33 | #29 |
Golden
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,652
|
As far as I know some users (me for example) don't have the time limit on youtube anymore.
Maybe it's got something to do with how long one already is on YT? |
30-12-10, 12:35 | #30 |
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 21
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|