![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States ♀
Posts: 3,676
|
![]() Quote:
Understanding in its infancy, or understanding subject to revisions when additional data demands an accepted model be reexamined, does not disqualify it. Trying to separate it from this, by insisting it must be otherwise it would cease being magick, is special pleading. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Professor
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Coulrophilia
Posts: 3,479
|
![]()
Special pleading.. that's a new one to me!
Is the whole purpose of this to make me disbelieve in magick? You can be honest ![]()
__________________
Well if that ain't aren't the isn't |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Professor
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States ♀
Posts: 3,676
|
![]()
No, I'm trying to explain why the common explanations, such as magick is separate from science, are uncompelling to me. Why I stopped believing and stopped practicing it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Professor
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Coulrophilia
Posts: 3,479
|
![]()
I am for studying every possible aspect of phenomena and NOT using "magic" as an explanation. Technology is above all. But science and magick have always been friends, and once magick is proven, it becomes science. Hence Alchemy-->Chemistry.
Maybe the perceptions and influence are all in my head then? All I know is coincidences and fortune have been happening with more frequency ever since I've fully embraced this interest that I've always had despite the majority of people I've opened up to tell me it's utterly false. Honestly this conversation is nothing new to me ![]() I've sort of concluded long ago that trying to learn a specific type of ritual from one main spiritual source is conformity, the opposite of magick. I call upon no gods or human superstition. I am the Origin. If it all is just a distilled form of self-esteem that I've never had before then that works well enough for me. I apologize for not being compelling ![]()
__________________
Well if that ain't aren't the isn't Last edited by HarleyCroft; 05-11-22 at 19:32. Reason: The whole c/ck thing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Professor
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States ♀
Posts: 3,676
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Professor
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Coulrophilia
Posts: 3,479
|
![]()
You think it is false, I think it is real.
We could continue to discuss it if you want but you literally just dismissed my understanding of the unconceptual concept so.. where do we go from here?
__________________
Well if that ain't aren't the isn't |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Professor
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States ♀
Posts: 3,676
|
![]()
We walk away and let the discussion rest. I doubt either of us can convince the other of our respective position.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Coulrophilia
Posts: 3,479
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It takes courage to make such a lifestyle/belief change after spending so much time and personal energy into it. While not all change is growth, all growth is maturity. May I ask what you do for a profession now? Do you currently have any sort of creator/afterlife beliefs? (If you don't mind me asking after we both agreed to part ways. I would take any answer whether it's long, short or "**** off") I usually say Unaffiliated for simplicity's sake when asked.. even saying Agnostic sounds like a damn religion ![]()
__________________
Well if that ain't aren't the isn't |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States ♀
Posts: 3,676
|
![]() Quote:
I am a technical writer and eLearning developer for a fairly large company. And at the moment, no, I have no creator entity or afterlife beliefs. I did hold them once. I have become exceptionally skeptical after setting down my crystals and cards. At this point, I very much hold the opinion that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Coulrophilia
Posts: 3,479
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I'm glad you found a vocation better suited for you ![]() ![]() Learned that one back in the day from the Sword in the Stone. As well as -much like a gun is only as big as the person holding it- magick is only as powerful as the logic/drive behind it ◇♧♡♤ Glamour originally comes from the word 'enchantment' and while it's come to mean fancy and extravagant in magick it still means appearing as something you're not. Black eyeliner is great but there's something about white facepaint in combination... It's not quite a glamour because it's not used to mask but instead is an expression of inside. I love the concept of being judged based on personality alone. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Pennywise is the only example here that is pure evil (I like the It movies but he ain't my boy) and I don't think this scene would be so impactful if he wasn't clowning up. Ugh, you would have to press so hard to scratch through greasepaint like that Fun fact: I can roll one eye to the side like Bill Skarsgård can. In days of old, apparently doing that to someone is a form of The Evil Eye. Once I used it to end a convo with a creepy guy who wouldn't go away because it's not very sexy lol ♤☆◇♧ "Feel demons here, Mal?" "I think WE'RE the demons" ![]()
__________________
Well if that ain't aren't the isn't Last edited by HarleyCroft; 18-11-22 at 20:41. Reason: ♤♡♧◇ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|